
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Comparison of low temperature waste heat recovery methods
Comparison of low temperature waste heat recovery methods
Abstract Large amounts of heat is wasted through air coolers and water coolers for cooling low temperature ( H ) recovered in the evaporator were 8.0–8.6 MW for ORC using i-pentane as working fluid and 8.2–8.3 MW for Kalina cycle, respectively. Efficiency (η) of selected systems obtained at the highest power generated (W T ) was 10.0% (W T = 862 kW) for ORC and 10.57% (W T = 996 kW) for Kalina cycle within the design boundaries. Calculated carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emission reduction potential was 2260 t/y for ORC and 2600 t/y for Kalina system, respectively, at advantageous process conditions. Results showed that Kalina cycle provided higher efficiency and power generation ability on expense of higher system pressure (29 bar–7 bar). Economic calculations showed that the payback time is about 5.0 year for both systems.
- University of Pannonia Hungary
- University of Pannonia Hungary
- Southern California Gas Company United States
- Southern California Gas Company United States
