
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Carbon footprint and fossil energy consumption of bio-ethanol fuel production from Arundo donax L. crops on marginal lands of Southern Italy

handle: 11588/728962
Abstract A cradle-to-wheel life cycle analysis evaluated the greenhouse gas (GHG) contribution and fossil energy consumption (FEC) of bio-ethanol (EtOH) from dedicated crops on marginal lands in Campania Region (Southern Italy). The analysis processed experimental agronomic data of giant reed cultivated on hilly areas at high erosion risk and industrial data of feedstock conversion to EtOH, through second generation innovative technologies. Two ethanol–gasoline mixes (E10 and E85) were considered and compared with gasoline vehicle (GV). The E10 GHG and FEC profiles were driven by the gasoline input in the blend and the linked CO2 tailpipe emissions. The EtOH supply chain, especially the crop phase, was the major contributor to E85 impacts. The higher amount of biogenic C in E85 determined a marked reduction over GV of both GHG emissions (−60%) and FEC (−65%). The soil carbon storage would save 25 g CO2 eq per MJ; however, the issue is controversial due to the spatial and temporal variability of the process. Based on land availability, E85 contribution to renewables in the regional transport sector would amount to 4% and the blend wall would be far from saturation. A possible mismatch between future flexi-fuel vehicles density and E85 availability should be considered.
- University Federico II of Naples Italy
- University of Siena Italy
- University of Siegen Germany
- University of Siena Italy
Giant reed, GHG mitigation, Mechanical Engineering, Bioethanol; Environmental impact; Fossil energy saving; GHG mitigation; Giant reed; Lignocellulosic feedstock; Civil and Structural Engineering; Building and Construction; Pollution; Mechanical Engineering; Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering; Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bioethanol, Lignocellulosic feedstock, Building and Construction, Pollution, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Environmental impact, Fossil energy saving, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering
Giant reed, GHG mitigation, Mechanical Engineering, Bioethanol; Environmental impact; Fossil energy saving; GHG mitigation; Giant reed; Lignocellulosic feedstock; Civil and Structural Engineering; Building and Construction; Pollution; Mechanical Engineering; Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering; Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bioethanol, Lignocellulosic feedstock, Building and Construction, Pollution, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Environmental impact, Fossil energy saving, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).20 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
