
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Patterns of domestic exposure to carbon monoxide and particulate matter in households using biomass fuel in Janakpur, Nepal

Patterns of domestic exposure to carbon monoxide and particulate matter in households using biomass fuel in Janakpur, Nepal
Household Air Pollution (HAP) from biomass cooking fuels is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low-income settings worldwide. In Nepal the use of open stoves with solid biomass fuels is the primary method of domestic cooking. To assess patterns of domestic air pollution we performed continuous measurement of carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate Matter (PM2.5) in 12 biomass fuel households in Janakpur, Nepal. We measured kitchen PM2.5 and CO concentrations at one-minute intervals for an approximately 48-h period using the TSI DustTrak II 8530/SidePak AM510 (TSI Inc, St. Paul MN, USA) or EL-USB-CO data logger (Lascar Electronics, Erie PA, USA) respectively. We also obtained information regarding fuel, stove and kitchen characteristics and cooking activity patterns. Household cooking was performed in two daily sessions (median total duration 4 h) with diurnal variability in pollutant concentrations reflecting morning and evening cooking sessions and peak concentrations associated with fire-lighting. We observed a strong linear relationship between PM2.5 measurements obtained by co-located photometric and gravimetric monitoring devices, providing local calibration factors of 4.9 (DustTrak) and 2.7 (SidePak). Overall 48-h average CO and PM2.5 concentrations were 5.4 (SD 4.3) ppm (12 households) and 417.6 (SD 686.4) μg/m3 (8 households), respectively, with higher average concentrations associated with cooking and heating activities. Overall average PM2.5 concentrations and peak 1-h CO concentrations exceeded WHO Indoor Air Quality Guidelines. Average hourly PM2.5 and CO concentrations were moderately correlated (r = 0.52), suggesting that CO has limited utility as a proxy measure for PM2.5 exposure assessment in this setting. Domestic indoor air quality levels associated with biomass fuel combustion in this region exceed WHO Indoor Air Quality standards and are in the hazardous range for human health.
- University College London United Kingdom
- King's College London United Kingdom
- University of Birmingham United Kingdom
- Mother and Infant Research Activities Nepal
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust United Kingdom
Household Air Pollution, exposure assessment, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 610, Toxicology, 333, carbon monoxide, Article, Fires, Heating, Nepal, Air Pollution, MD Multidisciplinary, Humans, Indoor, Biomass, Cooking, Carbon monoxide, Poverty, particulate matter, Carbon Monoxide, Family Characteristics, Inhalation Exposure, biomass, Pollution, Household air pollution, Air Pollution, Indoor, Exposure assessment, Particulate Matter, Particulate matter, Environmental Sciences
Household Air Pollution, exposure assessment, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 610, Toxicology, 333, carbon monoxide, Article, Fires, Heating, Nepal, Air Pollution, MD Multidisciplinary, Humans, Indoor, Biomass, Cooking, Carbon monoxide, Poverty, particulate matter, Carbon Monoxide, Family Characteristics, Inhalation Exposure, biomass, Pollution, Household air pollution, Air Pollution, Indoor, Exposure assessment, Particulate Matter, Particulate matter, Environmental Sciences
3 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).79 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
