A synopsis of land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) under the Kyoto Protocol and Marrakech Accords
Copyright policy )A synopsis of land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) under the Kyoto Protocol and Marrakech Accords
The complexities inherent in land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) activities have led to contentious and prolonged debates about the merits of their inclusion in the 2008–2012 first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. Yet the inclusion of these activities played a key role in agreement on the general framework of the Kyoto Protocol, and LULUCF will likely continue to play a substantial part in negotiations on national commitments post-2012. The Marrakech Accords dictate which LULUCF activities are to be included under the Kyoto Protocol and provide rules on how they are to be accounted in the first commitment period. However, these rules have limitations and drawbacks that may be avoided in the structure of future commitments beyond 2012. Through adherence to the objectives of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and the incorporation of several critical features, a future framework can more effectively address the mitigation challenges and opportunities of this sector.
- Max Planck Society Germany
- Union of Concerned Scientists United Kingdom
- Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia Brazil
- Union of Concerned Scientists United States
- Natural Resources Defense Council United States
IR-78861, Cropland, Removals, bioenergy, Land Use, SDG 13 - Climate Action, Bioenergy, Deforestation, agriculture, SDG 15 - Life on Land, Non-permanence, Keywords: afforestation, saturation, article, forestry, LULUCF, Sequestration, Agriculture, Forestry, Saturation, removals, carbon stocks, Grazing, Carbon stocks, Policy, climate change, priority journal, greenhouse gas, Emissions, Priority Journal, Air Pollution Control, air pollution control, Marrakech Accords, Gross-net accounting, policy, 330, Marrakech accords, 333, SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals, Afforestation, cropland, non-permanence, gross-net accounting, deforestation, grazing, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, Reforestation, Ecosystem, Net-net accounting, ecosystem, Atmosphere, carbon, emissions, land use, Kyoto Protocol, Greenhouse Gas, carbon sequestration, Carbon, atmosphere, Kyoto protocol, Bio-energy, reforestation Bioenergy
IR-78861, Cropland, Removals, bioenergy, Land Use, SDG 13 - Climate Action, Bioenergy, Deforestation, agriculture, SDG 15 - Life on Land, Non-permanence, Keywords: afforestation, saturation, article, forestry, LULUCF, Sequestration, Agriculture, Forestry, Saturation, removals, carbon stocks, Grazing, Carbon stocks, Policy, climate change, priority journal, greenhouse gas, Emissions, Priority Journal, Air Pollution Control, air pollution control, Marrakech Accords, Gross-net accounting, policy, 330, Marrakech accords, 333, SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals, Afforestation, cropland, non-permanence, gross-net accounting, deforestation, grazing, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, Reforestation, Ecosystem, Net-net accounting, ecosystem, Atmosphere, carbon, emissions, land use, Kyoto Protocol, Greenhouse Gas, carbon sequestration, Carbon, atmosphere, Kyoto protocol, Bio-energy, reforestation Bioenergy
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).126 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!