
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Livestock exclusion from watercourses: Policy effectiveness and implications

The deterioration of water quality in Ireland over the past thirty years and the nutrient losses from agriculture are of particular concern to policy makers. Agri-environmental schemes (AES) are designed to improve the environment and water quality. One of the more common AES measures is the exclusion of cattle from watercourses. Cattle exclusion provides a number of benefits such as reduction in nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment run-off, riverbank stability and improved vegetation cover and biodiversity. Using GIS methods a new national farm boundary spatial database SLIDE (Spatial Land Identification Database for Eire) is created utilising national administrative data and a spatial data storage model. This is the first examination of cattle exclusion and its cost effectiveness at the individual farm level across a national population of farms. Benefits are measured in the form of reduced in-stream faecal deposits. The spatial distribution of cost-effectiveness at the sub-catchment level highlights the differences between areas in terms of costs, benefits and extent. A cluster analysis is used to aggregate results. This information is utilised to undertake an ex-ante examination of the implications of a national policy to restrict cattle access to waterbodies for specific categories of farmers, under the EU Nitrates Directive. The analysis of the clusters show that due to the reduction of faecal deposition in watercourses, fencing on medium and high intensity farms is similar to 20 % more cost effective relative to farms with lower livestock densities. This study makes an important contribution to the literature in broadening our understanding of the impacts of policy decision making at the individual farm level and also the costs and scale of AES measures at a national level.
- Department of Agriculture Food and the Marine Ireland
- University of Galway Ireland
- Maastricht University Netherlands
- Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority Ireland
AGRICULTURE, GRASSLAND, IMPACT, river, NEW-ZEALAND, runoff, water quality, nitrogen, environmental policy, cost benefit analysis, geographic information system, phosphorus, biodiversity, Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics: General, bovine, COST, Agriculture, q00 - "Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics: General", agricultural land, PHOSPHORUS, Sustainability, priority journal, WATER-QUALITY, Policy analysis, STRATEGIES, catchment area (hydrology), Environment, MITIGATION, Article, agricultural worker, vegetation, DAIRY FARMS, 2 International, nonhuman, cost effectiveness analysis, nutrient, Spatial analysis, nitric acid derivative, livestock, sediment, Ireland, cluster analysis
AGRICULTURE, GRASSLAND, IMPACT, river, NEW-ZEALAND, runoff, water quality, nitrogen, environmental policy, cost benefit analysis, geographic information system, phosphorus, biodiversity, Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics: General, bovine, COST, Agriculture, q00 - "Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics: General", agricultural land, PHOSPHORUS, Sustainability, priority journal, WATER-QUALITY, Policy analysis, STRATEGIES, catchment area (hydrology), Environment, MITIGATION, Article, agricultural worker, vegetation, DAIRY FARMS, 2 International, nonhuman, cost effectiveness analysis, nutrient, Spatial analysis, nitric acid derivative, livestock, sediment, Ireland, cluster analysis
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).16 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
