Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Aalborg University R...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Energy Research & Social Science
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
VBN
Article . 2020
Data sources: VBN
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A cognitive mess: Mixed feelings about wind farms on the Danish coast and the emotions of energy infrastructure opposition

Authors: Paul Upham; Paul Upham; Katinka Johansen;

A cognitive mess: Mixed feelings about wind farms on the Danish coast and the emotions of energy infrastructure opposition

Abstract

The majority of local respondents in a large-scale survey were in favour of planned local wind farms on the Danish coast, despite these wind farm plans being the source of wider public and political contestation and opposition. Here we discuss results from the open-ended questions in the survey, specifically focusing on comments expressing how some respondents felt split in their views of these wind farms, accepting the need for renewable energy while at the same time being concerned about the potential local impact of the wind farms. Building on previous theoretical propositions relating to energy infrastructure opposition, here we apply the concept of cognitive polyphasia in some depth, providing a socio-cognitive account of the internal contradiction of being positively disposed to renewable energy in principle, but concerned about or opposed to specific de­velopments in localities. We distinguish a cognitive polyphasic account of such mixed feelings from cognitive dissonance accounts, and we identify several types of polyphasic representations, providing a basis for further work in other cases.

The majority of local respondents in a large-scale survey were in favour of planned local wind farms on theDanish coast, despite these wind farm plans being the source of wider public and political contestation andopposition. Here we discuss results from the open-ended questions in the survey, specifically focusing oncommentsexpressinghowsomerespondentsfeltsplitintheirviewsofthesewindfarms,acceptingtheneedforrenewableenergywhileatthesametimebeingconcernedaboutthepotentiallocalimpactofthewindfarms.Building on previous theoretical propositions relating to energy infrastructure opposition, here we apply theconceptofcognitivepolyphasiainsomedepth,providingasocio-cognitiveaccountoftheinternalcontradictionof being positively disposed to renewable energy in principle, but concerned about or opposed to specific de-velopments in localities. We distinguish a cognitive polyphasic account of such mixed feelings from cognitivedissonanceaccounts,andweidentify severaltypesofpolyphasicrepresentations,providingabasisforfurtherworkinothercases

Country
Denmark
Keywords

Social Psychology, offshore, Social acceptance, Denmark, Cognitive polyphasia, Public objection, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2104; name=Nuclear Energy and Engineering, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2105; name=Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, public perceptions, Social representations, /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/affordable_and_clean_energy; name=SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, survey, Offshore wind, cognitive dissonance, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2103; name=Fuel Technology, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3301; name=Social Sciences (miscellaneous), wind farms, Nearshore wind, sustainability, renewable energy, Acceptance, energy transitions, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/environmental_governance; name=Environmental Governance, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/sustainability_governance; name=Sustainability Governance, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2102; name=Energy Engineering and Power Technology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    24
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
24
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Green