Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ University of Florid...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Forest Ecology and Management
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Effects of land-use and hydroperiod on aboveground biomass and productivity of secondary Amazonian floodplain forests

Authors: Lucas, C. M.; Schöngart, J.; Sheikh, P.; Wittmann, Florian; Piedade, Maria Teresa Fernandez; McGrath, D. G.;

Effects of land-use and hydroperiod on aboveground biomass and productivity of secondary Amazonian floodplain forests

Abstract

Abstract Tropical floodplain forests are productive and diverse ecosystems for which there is scant data on biomass, carbon sequestration, and potential abiotic and human drivers. We used a regression approach to test the effects of seasonal flood duration, forest age, and livestock activity on aboveground biomass (AGB) and annual biomass accumulation (ABA) in 49 plots of 0.1 ha in secondary floodplain forests of the Lower Amazon over nine years. AGB averaged 226 ± 87 Mg ha−1 among forests 30–120 years old. An intermediate peak model explained spatial variation in AGB, peaking in moderately flooded (70–140 d y−1) forests. Flood duration was the key explanatory factor for AGB across all plots. In contrast, forest age and its interaction with flood duration affected net ABA, which declined from 10.3 ± 4.3 to −6.2 ± 11.1 Mg ha−1 y−1 with increasing age. Tree diameter growth comprised 95 ± 4% of total ABA, which declined with increasing flood duration and increasing forest age. Overall, forests had a high capacity to capture carbon, accumulating 16.4 ± 7.1 Mg ha−1 y−1 in AGB, but had high turnover of biomass at 76 ± 81% of AGB per year. There was no strong evidence for differences in biomass accumulation due to livestock activity. We fill a major geographical gap for ground-based data on biomass of flooded forests, which comprise 11% of the Amazon Basin, and also provide an example of community-based monitoring for carbon storage in human-dominated tropical floodplain ecosystems.

Countries
Brazil, United States, Brazil, Germany
Keywords

Wetland Forests, Carbon Sequestration, 550, Geography & travel, Land-use Change, Growth, 910, Ecosystems, Aboveground Biomass, Mato Grosso, Floodplain, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/910, Biomass, Community-based Monitoring, Succession, Amazon Basin, Data Set, Brasil, Forestry, ddc:910, Bioaccumulation, Floods, Spatial Variations, Banks (bodies Of Water), Wetland, Biomass Accumulation, Tree Diameter Growth, Varzea Grande

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green