
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Techno-economic assessment of biomass slow pyrolysis into different biochar and methanol concepts

Abstract Methanol is one of the fuels that are an alternative to petroleum-based liquid transport fuels. This paper assesses the feasibility of co-production of methanol and biochar from thermal treatment of pine in a two-stage process; pyrolysis or gasification to produce biochar and volatiles, and the processing of the volatiles to produce methanol using process data for large-scale conversions based on natural gas. Three concepts were studied: (i) slow pyrolysis at 300 °C; (ii) slow pyrolysis at 450 °C; and (iii) gasification at 800 °C, all of them followed by processing of the volatiles into syngas and the conversion of the syngas into methanol. Gasification was able to generate methanol at or below current (2012) prices of methanol produced from fossil fuel ($422/t) from a plant size of 100 t/h upwards. Pyrolysis is not competitive without valuing the biochar as a product. Considering both biochar and methanol as marketable products improves the viability of slow pyrolysis concepts. Their profitability is sensitive to the biochar selling price between, with a break-even at a biochar price of about $220/t for the pyrolysis at 300 °C and about $280/t for pyrolysis at 450 °C.
- Cornell University United States
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).148 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
