
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Improving the performance of calcium looping for solar thermochemical energy storage and CO2 capture
handle: 11588/852161 , 20.500.14243/430799
Concentrating solar thermal (CST) technologies for power production can play a major role in the future portfolio of renewable energies. Limestone calcination/carbonation (Calcium Looping (CaL)), is an appealing reaction whose integration with CST is widely investigated for thermochemical energy storage (TCES) and carbon capture and storage/utilization (CCSU). Experimental data under realistic CST conditions/reactors currently lacks, since most of the experimental activities have been performed in thermogravimetric analyzers. In this study, CaL-CST integration was investigated in a lab-scale directly irradiated fluidized bed reactor, able to mimic the operating conditions required for industrial implementation of the technology. Three different techniques to improve the performance of CaL-CST for TCES and CCSU were investigated: i) lowering of calcination temperature; ii) precalcination; iii) use of dolomite instead of limestone. Experimental results revealed that all the strategies moderately improve system performance. After 20 cycles, depending on the technique applied, the mean carbonation degree ranges within 28.1-37.1% (TCES) and 15.3-18.7% (CCSU) with limestone, and values 61.5% (TCES) and 36.7% (CCSU) with dolomite. Figures of energy storage density are less sensitive to the different techniques, as pay for the lower calcination temperature (limestone), or for the presence of an inert MgO fraction (dolomite). Corresponding values range within 941-1065 MJ m (TCES) and 777-872 MJ m (CCSU), for loose-packed conditions. N-physisorption analyses revealed that the increased reactivity arises from better microstructural properties in terms of specific surface. Optimal choice among the different strategies should consider the intrinsic peculiarities of each investigated technique.
- National Research Council Italy
- University Federico II of Naples Italy
- University of Sannio Italy
Fluidized bed, Dolomite and limestone calcination, Solar energy, Concentrated solar power (CSP); Dolomite and limestone calcination; Fluidized bed; Particle receiver; Precalcination; Solar energy, Concentrated solar power (CSP), Precalcination, Particle receiver
Fluidized bed, Dolomite and limestone calcination, Solar energy, Concentrated solar power (CSP); Dolomite and limestone calcination; Fluidized bed; Particle receiver; Precalcination; Solar energy, Concentrated solar power (CSP), Precalcination, Particle receiver
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).51 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
