
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Technico-economic assessment of coal and sawdust co-firing power generation with CO2 capture

Abstract Biomass, in contrast with different type of fossil fuels, is considered a renewable energy source (RES), having a neutral carbon impact in burning processes. As a result, biomass co-firing offers a good potential solution for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in conventional coal fired power plants. This paper evaluates the technical and economic aspects of biomass co-firing electricity production with and without CO2 capture (CC) using different mixtures of coal and sawdust. The impact of biomass co-firing on power plant performances were evaluated in terms of energy efficiency, auxiliary power consumption, capital costs, operational & maintenance (O&M) costs, specific CO2 emissions, electricity cost and CO2 avoidance costs. Depending on the feedstock composition, the biomass co-firing power plant generates 750–800 MW electricity in the case of carbon capture and 980–1027 MW electricity without capture. The results indicate a continuous decrease in both technical and economical performances with the increase of biomass content in the feedstock.
- Babeș-Bolyai University Romania
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).34 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
