
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Biogas reduces the carbon footprint of cassava starch: a comparative assessment with fuel oil

Abstract In the past 10 years, 90% of cassava starch factories in Thailand have switched from fuel oil to renewable biogas, to cover part of their energy needs. The environmental benefits of switching to biogas have not been assessed quantitatively. To alleviate this, this study assessed 100-year greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, or carbon footprint (CF), of cassava starch production for four factories in Thailand. Key results demonstrate that biogas reduces the carbon footprint of the Thai cassava starch industry as a whole by 0.9–1.0 million tons CO2eq/year, and highlight methodological precautions to collect LCI data and allocate GHG emissions between co-products with high moisture contents. The system boundaries included farm stage (production of cassava roots), transportation to factory and processing into native starch. The functional unit (FU) was one ton of native cassava starch at 13% water content. Biogas produced from the factory wastewater (95–200 m3/FU) was the main source of thermal energy for starch drying, and for on-site electricity production when excess biogas was available. The total CF of cassava starch was in the range 609–966 kg CO2eq/FU. Agricultural production contributed 60% of the carbon footprint, mainly from the use of nitrogen fertilizers. GHG emissions of root production varied widely due to (1) the diversity of farming practices even within a small radius (50 km), and (2) different agricultural yields in different regions. The contribution of the factory stage to the carbon footprint depended on the use of electricity, biogas and other fuels, ranging from 217 to 342 kg CO2eq/FU. Allocation rules such as wet weight or dry weight basis allocations affected the results markedly.
Analyse du cycle de vie, Carbone, Manihot esculenta, P06 - Sources d'énergie renouvelable, Biocarburant, Manioc, Q02 - Traitement et conservation des produits alimentaires, Production énergétique, Réutilisation des eaux, Q60 - Traitement des produits agricoles non alimentaires, E21 - Agro-industrie, Industrie de l'amidon, Impact sur l'environnement, Q70 - Traitement des déchets agricoles, Plante énergétique, Biogaz, Eau usée, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, Amidon, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_7372, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_24420, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_24836, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_8308, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_9000105, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_27465, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_9262, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_7701, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_7369, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_15583, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_36345, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_4579, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_1301, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_9649
Analyse du cycle de vie, Carbone, Manihot esculenta, P06 - Sources d'énergie renouvelable, Biocarburant, Manioc, Q02 - Traitement et conservation des produits alimentaires, Production énergétique, Réutilisation des eaux, Q60 - Traitement des produits agricoles non alimentaires, E21 - Agro-industrie, Industrie de l'amidon, Impact sur l'environnement, Q70 - Traitement des déchets agricoles, Plante énergétique, Biogaz, Eau usée, P01 - Conservation de la nature et ressources foncières, Amidon, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_7372, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_24420, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_24836, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_8308, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_9000105, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_27465, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_9262, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_7701, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_7369, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_15583, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_36345, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_4579, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_1301, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_9649
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).41 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
