Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Cleaner P...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Cleaner Production
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Evaluation of lithium-ion batteries through the simultaneous consideration of environmental, economic and electrochemical performance indicators

Authors: Chade Li; Yuan Gong; Yajuan Yu; Kai Huang; Jianxing Hu;

Evaluation of lithium-ion batteries through the simultaneous consideration of environmental, economic and electrochemical performance indicators

Abstract

Abstract When Lithium-ion Batteries (LIBs) are claimed to be ‘green’, they should not only exhibit outstanding electrochemical performances but also have a relatively lower environmental impact and attractive prices and benefits. From this point of view, we establish a comprehensive LIB evaluation system based on a multi-layer index and provide a comprehensive method for evaluating battery performance. The assessment system considers three aspects: environmental impacts, economic parameters, and electrochemical performances, with several indicators for each aspect. We use the footprint family of indexes to characterise the environmental impact of the battery. We analyse the comprehensive performance and evaluate the size of the market competitiveness with quantitative comparisons of the scores for each battery. A comprehensive assessment system with eleven indicators relating to the three aspects is built. As the indicators have different dimensions and units, we use a calculation method called entropy weight to normalise and nondimensionalise the indices; thus, a comprehensive evaluation value for each sample battery could be achieved. To realise the assessment system with practical samples, we choose four kinds of cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries, including LiFePO4/C, LiFe0.98Mn0.02PO4/C, FeF3(H2O)3/C and LiMn2O4/C, as study objects, and the average values of the comprehensive evaluation indexes for the four battery samples are0.034, 0.041, −0.027, and 0.052, respectively. The lower the comprehensive evaluation value is, the better the performance of the product will be. The FeF3(H2O)3/C battery has the best performance when combining 1 kg of battery cathode material. The results reflect the advantages and disadvantages of different types of battery in terms of processing, cost and environmental performance. The establishment of a comprehensive evaluation system for lithium-ion batteries is not only conducive to the scientific evaluation and optimisation of the wide variety of battery materials that are currently available but also to discovering battery materials with more competitive market prospects. The application of this system is not limited to batteries.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    42
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
42
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%