
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
EPICA Dome C record of glacial and interglacial intensities

handle: 11368/2626887 , 10278/42700
Climate models show strong links between Antarctic and global temperature both in future and in glacial climate simulations. Past Antarctic temperatures can be estimated from measurements of water stable isotopes along the EPICA Dome C ice core over the past 800 000 years. Here we focus on the reliability of the relative intensities of glacial and interglacial periods derived from the stable isotope profile. The consistency between stable isotope-derived temperature and other environmental and climatic proxies measured along the EDC ice core is analysed at the orbital scale and compared with estimates of global ice volume. MIS 2, 12 and 16 appear as the strongest glacial maxima, while MIS 5.5 and 11 appear as the warmest interglacial maxima. The links between EDC temperature, global temperature, local and global radiative forcings are analysed. We show: (i) a strong but changing link between EDC temperature and greenhouse gas global radiative forcing in the first and second part of the record; (ii) a large residual signature of obliquity in EDC temperature with a 5 ky lag; (iii) the exceptional character of temperature variations within interglacial periods. Focusing on MIS 5.5, the warmest interglacial of EDC record, we show that orbitally forced coupled climate models only simulate a precession-induced shift of the Antarctic seasonal cycle of temperature. While they do capture annually persistent Greenland warmth, models fail to capture the warming indicated by Antarctic ice core dD. We suggest that the model-data mismatch may result from the lack of feedbacks between ice sheets and climate including both local Antarctic effects due to changes in ice sheet topography and global effects due to meltwater–thermohaline circulation interplays. An MIS 5.5 sensitivity study conducted with interactive Greenland melt indeed induces a slight Antarctic warming. We suggest that interglacial EDC optima are caused by transient heat transport redistribution comparable with glacial north–south seesaw abrupt climatic changes.
- Grenoble Alpes University France
- University of Chicago United States
- National Center for Atmospheric Research United States
- University of Trieste Italy
- Goddard Institute for Space Studies United States
Glacial climate, thermocline, 550, Sensitivity studies, Glaciology, Greenland, [SDU.STU.GL] Sciences of the Universe/Earth Sciences/Glaciology, Isotopes, stable isotope, Radiative forcings, Global effects, climate modeling, Stable isotopes, Data mismatch, bipolar seesaw, Global warming, interglacial, Glacial maxima, Thermohaline circulations, ice sheet, MIS 5.5, Greenhouse gases, climate change, Relative intensity, Glaciers, Strong link, Ice sheet, Interglacial periods, 290, Antarctic ice core, Ice core, Domes, [ SDU.STU.GL ] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Glaciology, Water stable isotopes, Past Antarctic temperature, Seasonal cycle, Climate model, Global ice volume, Climate models, Transient heat, Meteorology and Climatology, Coupled climate model, [SDU.STU.GL]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Glaciology, [SDU.STU.GL] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Glaciology, radiative forcing, Ice, Climatic changes, Switching circuits, Glacial geology, Temperature variation, glacial and interglacial period, Global temperatures, Antarctica, Past Antarctic temperatures; glacial and interglacial periods; stable isotopes; aerosol content; radiative forcings; MIS 5.5; bipolar seesaw, aerosol content
Glacial climate, thermocline, 550, Sensitivity studies, Glaciology, Greenland, [SDU.STU.GL] Sciences of the Universe/Earth Sciences/Glaciology, Isotopes, stable isotope, Radiative forcings, Global effects, climate modeling, Stable isotopes, Data mismatch, bipolar seesaw, Global warming, interglacial, Glacial maxima, Thermohaline circulations, ice sheet, MIS 5.5, Greenhouse gases, climate change, Relative intensity, Glaciers, Strong link, Ice sheet, Interglacial periods, 290, Antarctic ice core, Ice core, Domes, [ SDU.STU.GL ] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Glaciology, Water stable isotopes, Past Antarctic temperature, Seasonal cycle, Climate model, Global ice volume, Climate models, Transient heat, Meteorology and Climatology, Coupled climate model, [SDU.STU.GL]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Glaciology, [SDU.STU.GL] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Glaciology, radiative forcing, Ice, Climatic changes, Switching circuits, Glacial geology, Temperature variation, glacial and interglacial period, Global temperatures, Antarctica, Past Antarctic temperatures; glacial and interglacial periods; stable isotopes; aerosol content; radiative forcings; MIS 5.5; bipolar seesaw, aerosol content
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).194 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
