<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Why “Circular” doesn't always mean “Sustainable”

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 01 Nov 2020Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2020 Switzerland, Switzerland Publisher:Elsevier BVJournal:Resources, Conservation and Recycling, volume 162, page 105,042 (issn: 0921-3449,

Authors: N.U. Blum; M. Haupt; C.R. Bening;

doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105042 , 10.3929/ethz-b-000426900 , 10.24451/arbor.21769

Why “Circular” doesn't always mean “Sustainable”

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162

ISSN:0921-3449

ISSN:1879-0658

Countries

Switzerland, Switzerland

Related Organizations

ETH Zurich
Switzerland
Environmental Engineering Institute
Switzerland

Keywords

Material circularity, Circular economy, Circular economy; Sustainability; Material circularity, Sustainability, Circular economy Sustainability Material circularity

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	112
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%