
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Total aboveground biomass in central Amazonian rainforests: a landscape-scale study

Total aboveground biomass in central Amazonian rainforests: a landscape-scale study
(Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) Amazonian forests play a key role in the global carbon cycle, but there is much uncertainty about the quantity and distribution of carbon stored in these forests. We quantified total aboveground dry biomass (TAGB) in undisturbed central Amazonian rainforests, based on detailed estimates of all live and dead plant material within 20 1 ha plots spanning an extensive (ca. 1000 km2) study area. TAGB values in our study area were very high, averaging 397:7 Æ 30:0 Mg haÀ1. The most important component of aboveground biomass was large (!10 cm diameter-at-breast-height (DBH)) trees, which comprised 81.9% of TAGB, followed by downed wood debris (7.0%), small trees, saplings, and seedlings (<10 cm DBH; 5.3%), lianas (2.1%), litter (1.9%), snags (1.5%), and stemless palms (0.3%). Among large trees, aboveground biomass was greatest in intermediate-sized (20–50 cm DBH) stems (46.7% of TAGB), with very large (!60 cm DBH) trees also containing substantial biomass (13.4% of TAGB). There were no significant correlations between large tree biomass and that of any other live or dead biomass component. An analysis based on the variability of our samples suggested that just 3–4 randomly positioned 1 ha plots would be sufficient to provide a reasonable estimate of mean TAGB in a landscape such as ours (with 95% confidence intervals being <10% of the mean). This suggests that efforts to quantify Amazon forest biomass should be extensive rather than intensive; researchers should sample many geographically separate areas with a few plots each, rather than sampling a small number of areas more intensively.
- National Institute of Amazonian Research Brazil
- Marquette University United States
- Marquette University United States
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Panama
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Panama
Carbon Sequestration, Rainforest, 550, bats, bat, Global Warming, Aboveground Biomass, Carbon Cycle, Chiroptera, Animalia, Biomass, Chordata, biomass lianas snags palms, Ecology, Forestry, Biodiversity, South America, Carbon, Mammalia
Carbon Sequestration, Rainforest, 550, bats, bat, Global Warming, Aboveground Biomass, Carbon Cycle, Chiroptera, Animalia, Biomass, Chordata, biomass lianas snags palms, Ecology, Forestry, Biodiversity, South America, Carbon, Mammalia
1 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2025IsCompiledBy
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).176 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
