Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Alcoholarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Alcohol
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
Alcohol
Article . 2001
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Relapse prevention in alcoholics by cigarette smoking? Involvement of nicotinic–dopaminergic mechanisms

Authors: Lutz G. Schmidt; Michael N. Smolka;

Relapse prevention in alcoholics by cigarette smoking? Involvement of nicotinic–dopaminergic mechanisms

Abstract

Because of a controversial view on the role of smoking in the recovery process of alcoholism, outcome data obtained for alcoholics who had been included in a long-term clinical trial with a putative anticraving drug were analyzed. To avoid unknown interactions between the drug under study and smoking behavior, only placebo-treated patients were evaluated in this investigation. After 12 months of rehabilitation, there was no significant difference regarding abstinence rate between 48 smoking alcoholics (who reported that they smoked 32 cigarettes on average per day) and 15 nonsmoking alcoholics (33% vs. 20%). However, smokers tended to be abstinent longer than nonsmokers (173 vs. 114 days; P= .092). This possible advantage might be related to nicotinic effects on central dopamine systems in smokers, as indicated by higher growth hormone secretion after apomorphine stimulation obtained in smokers, compared with findings for nonsmokers (area under the curve during chronic intoxication: 2253 vs. 1247 microg/min/l; P= .019). Multivariate regression analysis revealed a decreasing effect of ethanol blood level (P= .006) and the number of fullfilled International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10) criteria of the alcohol dependence syndrome (P= .012) on stimulated growth hormone secretion. In contrast, the reported number of smoked cigarettes per day had an increasing effect (P= .034), accounting for 6% of the variance of growth hormone secretion. However, differences in outcome could also be explained by other clinical features as smokers, compared with nonsmokers, were more frequently males (78.3% vs. 60.7%) and younger when studied at index episode (mean age 44.45 vs. 48.21 years; P= .054), reported higher ethanol consumption in the month before hospital admission (262 g vs. 192 g; P= .044), and met more criteria for the ICD-10 alcohol dependence syndrome (6.6 vs. 6.0; P= .047). Therefore, it cannot be stringently inferred from our data that a possible advantage of smoking for alcoholism recovery is causally related to the effects of nicotine on cerebral systems or human behavior, as our findings had not been based on a randomized design.

Keywords

Male, Nicotine, Apomorphine, Ethanol, Human Growth Hormone, Dopamine, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Middle Aged, Alcoholism, Dopamine Agonists, Secondary Prevention, Humans, Female, Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    26
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
26
Average
Top 10%
Average