<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Multispecies sustainability

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Preprint 01 Jan 2020 Netherlands, Australia, Italy, Australia, Australia, Australia Publisher:Cambridge University Press (CUP)Journal:Global Sustainability, volume 3 (eissn: 2059-4798,

Authors: Christoph D. D. Rupprecht; Joost Vervoort; Chris Berthelsen; Astrid Mangnus; Natalie Osborne; Kyle Thompson; Andrea Y. F. Urushima; +12 Authors

doi: 10.1017/sus.2020.28 , 10.31235/osf.io/8j53u

handle: 2158/1320643 , 10072/401467

Multispecies sustainability

- Summary
- Subjects
- Related research
  (11)
- Metrics

Abstract

Non-technical summaryThe sustainability concept seeks to balance how present and future generations of humans meet their needs. But because nature is viewed only as a resource, sustainability fails to recognize that humans and other living beings depend on each other for their well-being. We therefore argue that true sustainability can only be achieved if the interdependent needs of all species of current and future generations are met, and propose calling this ‘multispecies sustainability’. We explore the concept through visualizations and scenarios, then consider how it might be applied through case studies involving bees and healthy green spaces.

Countries

Netherlands, Australia, Italy, Australia, Australia, Australia

Related Organizations

Nagoya University
Japan
University of Tasmania
Australia
Utrecht University
Netherlands
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature
Japan
Kyoto University
Japan

View all View all

Keywords

bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Geography|Nature and Society Relations, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Geography, system control and optimization, policies, politics and governance, GE1-350, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Environmental Studies, interdependence, Ecology, earth systems, more-than-human, 720, sustainability, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Geography, earth systems; interdependence; more-than-human; policies; politics and governance; system control and optimization, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Environmental Studies, Environmental sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, SocArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Geography|Nature and Society Relations

11 Research products, page 1 of 2

Folk perceptions for avian scavengers in a tropical megacity: implications for biocultural conservation
2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Neighborhood-level risk perceptions of extreme heat events across the U.S.
2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Understanding young people’s perception toward forestation as a strategy to mitigate climate change in a post-conflict developing country
2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Upscaling the resilience assessment through comparative analysis
2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Tornado-level estimates of socioeconomic and demographic variables
2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Environmental liability litigation could remedy biodiversity loss
2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Study of Population Activities in Establishing the Economic Welfare of Belawan Coastal Communities, North Sumatra
2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Performing nature's value: software and the making of Oregon's ecosystem services markets
2015IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Impacts and trade-offs of future land use and land cover change in Scotland: spatial simulation modelling of shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) at regional scales
2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Tackling the “wicked” conservation problem of tropical deforestation in global commodity supply chains using mixes of mechanisms
2021IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments

chevron_left
1
2
chevron_right

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	48
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%