
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Methane Storage in Metal-Substituted Metal–Organic Frameworks: Thermodynamics, Usable Capacity, and the Impact of Enhanced Binding Sites

doi: 10.1021/jp4104273
Methane Storage in Metal-Substituted Metal–Organic Frameworks: Thermodynamics, Usable Capacity, and the Impact of Enhanced Binding Sites
van der Waals density functional theory (vdW-DFT) and semiempirical grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) calculations are used to predict the thermodynamics and methane storage capacity of 18 metal-substituted variants of the metal–organic framework (MOF) M-DOBDC (DOBDC = 2,5-oxidobenzene-1,4-dicarboxylate). Methane adsorption enthalpies (ΔH) on the benchmark Mg- and Ni-DOBDC systems were calculated using several vdW-DFT methods. The vdW-DF2 scheme was found to yield the best agreement with experiments, with a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of 2.7 kJ/mol. Applying this functional across the entire M-DOBDC series, it is observed that ΔH varies from −16 to −34 kJ/mol. These enthalpies are 10–20 kJ/mol less exothermic than that for CO2 adsorption in M-DOBDC, consistent with a weaker, dispersion-based CH4–MOF interaction. In parallel with these thermodynamic analyses, methane adsorption isotherms for five benchmark M–DOBDC MOFs were evaluated using several established interatomic potentials. An uncharged, single...
- University of Michigan–Flint United States
2 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).45 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
