
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Time‐dependent inversion estimates of global biomass‐burning CO emissions using Measurement of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) measurements

doi: 10.1029/2005jd006613
handle: 1871/23277
We present an inverse‐modeling analysis of CO emissions using column CO retrievals from the Measurement of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) instrument and a global chemical transport model (GEOS‐CHEM). We first focus on the information content of MOPITT CO column retrievals in terms of constraining CO emissions associated with biomass burning and fossil fuel/biofuel use. Our analysis shows that seasonal variation of biomass‐burning CO emissions in Africa, South America, and Southeast Asia can be characterized using monthly mean MOPITT CO columns. For the fossil fuel/biofuel source category the derived monthly mean emission estimates are noisy even when the error statistics are accurately known, precluding a characterization of seasonal variations of regional CO emissions for this source category. The derived estimate of CO emissions from biomass burning in southern Africa during the June–July 2000 period is significantly higher than the prior estimate (prior, 34 Tg; posterior, 13 Tg). We also estimate that emissions are higher relative to the prior estimate in northern Africa during December 2000 to January 2001 and lower relative to the prior estimate in Central America and Oceania/Indonesia during April–May and September–October 2000, respectively. While these adjustments provide better agreement of the model with MOPITT CO column fields and with independent measurements of surface CO from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory at background sites in the Northern Hemisphere, some systematic differences between modeled and measured CO fields persist, including model overestimation of background surface CO in the Southern Hemisphere. Characterizing and accounting for underlying biases in the measurement model system are needed to improve the robustness of the top‐down estimates.
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Netherlands
- National Center for Atmospheric Research United States
- University Corporation for Atmospheric Research United States
- University of California System United States
- Goddard Space Flight Center United States
biomass burning, seasonal variation, Asia, Fossil fuels, Troposphere, atmospheric pollution, Air pollution, South America, 551, Southeast Asia, carbon monoxide, Africa, carbon emission, inverse analysis, Eurasia, Biomass, Error statistics, SDG 14 - Life Below Water, Particulate emissions, measurement method, Carbon monoxide, Estimation
biomass burning, seasonal variation, Asia, Fossil fuels, Troposphere, atmospheric pollution, Air pollution, South America, 551, Southeast Asia, carbon monoxide, Africa, carbon emission, inverse analysis, Eurasia, Biomass, Error statistics, SDG 14 - Life Below Water, Particulate emissions, measurement method, Carbon monoxide, Estimation
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).83 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
