
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Tradeoffs and Synergies Across Global Climate Change Adaptations in the Food‐Energy‐Water Nexus
doi: 10.1029/2021ef002201
handle: 10625/63263
AbstractFood‐energy‐water (FEW) systems are increasingly vulnerable to natural hazards and climate change risks, yet humans depend on these systems for their daily needs, wellbeing, and survival. We investigated how adaptations related to FEW vulnerabilities are occurring and what the global community can learn about the interactions across these adaptations. We conducted a global analysis of a data set derived from scientific literature to present the first large scale assessment (n = 1,204) of evidence‐based FEW‐related climate adaptations. We found that the most frequently reported adaptations to FEW vulnerabilities by continent occurred in Africa (n = 495) and Asia (n = 492). Adaptations targeting food security were more robustly documented than those relevant to water and energy security, suggesting a greater global demand to address food security. Determining statistically significant associations, we found a network of connections between variables characterizing FEW‐related adaptations and showed interconnectedness between a variety of natural hazards, exposures, sectors, actors, cross‐cutting topics and geographic locations. Connectivity was found between the vulnerabilities food security, water, community sustainability, and response to sea level rise across cities, settlements, and key infrastructure sectors. Additionally, generalized linear regression models revealed potential synergies and tradeoffs among FEW adaptations, such as a necessity to synergistically adapt systems to protect food and water security and tradeoffs when simultaneously addressing exposures of consumption and production vs. poverty. Results from qualitative thematic coding showcased that adaptations documented as targeting multiple exposures are still limited in considering interconnectivity of systems and applying a nexus approach in their responses. These results suggest that adopting a nexus approach to future FEW‐related adaptations can have profound benefits in the management of scarce resources and with financial constraints.
- Pennsylvania State University United States
- Spanish National Research Council Spain
- University of California System United States
- Virginia Tech United States
- University of California, Davis United States
550, Environmental Science and Management, Climate Change, Energy security, adaptation, 333, Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience, Atmospheric Sciences, Climate change, GE1-350, energy security, Adaptation, QH540-549.5, Geography, Climate Adaptation, Ecology, Prevention, Food security, food security, water security, Climatic change, Climate Action, Environmental sciences, climate change, Water security, Zero Hunger, Climate change - Adaptation
550, Environmental Science and Management, Climate Change, Energy security, adaptation, 333, Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience, Atmospheric Sciences, Climate change, GE1-350, energy security, Adaptation, QH540-549.5, Geography, Climate Adaptation, Ecology, Prevention, Food security, food security, water security, Climatic change, Climate Action, Environmental sciences, climate change, Water security, Zero Hunger, Climate change - Adaptation
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).14 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
