
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Forest management in southern China generates short term extensive carbon sequestration

pmid: 31913268
pmc: PMC6949300
Forest management in southern China generates short term extensive carbon sequestration
AbstractLand use policies have turned southern China into one of the most intensively managed forest regions in the world, with actions maximizing forest cover on soils with marginal agricultural potential while concurrently increasing livelihoods and mitigating climate change. Based on satellite observations, here we show that diverse land use changes in southern China have increased standing aboveground carbon stocks by 0.11 ± 0.05 Pg C y−1 during 2002–2017. Most of this regional carbon sink was contributed by newly established forests (32%), while forests already existing contributed 24%. Forest growth in harvested forest areas contributed 16% and non-forest areas contributed 28% to the carbon sink, while timber harvest was tripled. Soil moisture declined significantly in 8% of the area. We demonstrate that land management in southern China has been removing an amount of carbon equivalent to 33% of regional fossil CO2 emissions during the last 6 years, but forest growth saturation, land competition for food production and soil-water depletion challenge the longevity of this carbon sink service.
- Oklahoma City University United States
- University of Copenhagen Denmark
- Laboratoire de Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement France
- Spanish National Research Council Spain
- Kobe University Japan
Carbon sequestration, Cartography, Atmospheric Science, China, 550, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Science, Carbon Loss, Environmental protection, Article, Environmental science, Carbon sink, Impact of Climate Change on Forest Wildfires, Ecosystem services, Climate change, Agroforestry, Biology, Ecosystem, Global and Planetary Change, Geography, Ecology, Global Forest Drought Response and Climate Change, Q, Climate-change ecology, Forestry, Carbon cycle, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Earth and Planetary Sciences, Carbon dioxide, Archaeology, Sink (geography), FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Land use, Impacts of Climate Change on Glaciers and Water Availability
Carbon sequestration, Cartography, Atmospheric Science, China, 550, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Science, Carbon Loss, Environmental protection, Article, Environmental science, Carbon sink, Impact of Climate Change on Forest Wildfires, Ecosystem services, Climate change, Agroforestry, Biology, Ecosystem, Global and Planetary Change, Geography, Ecology, Global Forest Drought Response and Climate Change, Q, Climate-change ecology, Forestry, Carbon cycle, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Earth and Planetary Sciences, Carbon dioxide, Archaeology, Sink (geography), FOS: Biological sciences, Environmental Science, Physical Sciences, Land use, Impacts of Climate Change on Glaciers and Water Availability
1 Research products, page 1 of 1
- IsRelatedTo
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).369 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1%
