<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Evaluating different classes of porous materials for carbon capture

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 01 Jan 2014 Switzerland Publisher:Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)Journal:Energy Environ. Sci., volume 7, pages 4,132-4,146 (issn: 1754-5692, eissn: 1754-5706,

Authors: Mahdi Niknam Shahrak; Abhoyjit S. Bhown; Karsten Reuter; Maciej Haranczyk; Li-Chiang Lin; Richard L. Martin; Johanna M. Huck; +5 Authors

doi: 10.1039/c4ee02636e

Evaluating different classes of porous materials for carbon capture

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

We screen a wide selection of nano-porous materials with respect to CO2 capture from flue gas by employing the metric of parasitic energy designed to comprise the entire CCS process.

Country

Switzerland

Related Organizations

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
United States
Technical University of Munich
Germany
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
United States
Electric Power Research Institute
United States
Quchan University of Advanced Technology
Iran (Islamic Republic of)

View all View all

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	180
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%