
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Clinical Effect and Effective Rate of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gallstones Complicated with Gallbladder Polyps

This paperA total of 62 patients with gallstones and gallbladder polyps were selected from May 2019 to May 2020, who were divided into the observation group (n=31, laparoscopic cholecystectomy) and the control group (n=31, open cholecystectomy) in a 1:1 ratio. The clinical indicators, clinical efficacy, level of pain and complication rate of the two groups were recorded and compared. Results Indicators such as the operation duration (38.64±14.42min), blood loss (30.42±8.21ml), length of stay (4.71±1.82 d), first anal exhaust (21.82±6.65min), drainage volume (72.02±4.21ml), length of incision and the time for the recovery of gastrointestinal functions in the observation group were better than the control group (P<0.05). The clinical efficacy of the observation group (96.77%) was higher than that of the control group (80.65%), with statistical value =4.0260 (P<0.05). The level of pain of the observation group was lower than that of control group (P<0.05), while the complication rate in the observation group (3.22%) was also lower than that of the control group (22.58%) (P<0.05). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an effective treatment of gallstones complicated with gallbladder polyps, which can alleviate pain and improve the prognosis, and is thus worthy of promotion.
Environmental sciences, GE1-350
Environmental sciences, GE1-350
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
