
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Effects of national ecological restoration projects on carbon sequestration in China from 2001 to 2010

Significance China has launched six key ecological restoration projects since the late 1970s, but the contribution of these projects to terrestrial C sequestration remains unknown. In this study we examined the ecosystem C sink in the project area (∼16% of the country’s land area) and evaluated the project-induced C sequestration. The total annual C sink in the project area between 2001 and 2010 was estimated to be 132 Tg C per y, over half of which (74 Tg C per y, 56%) was caused by the implementation of the six projects. This finding indicates that the implementation of the ecological restoration projects in China has significantly increased ecosystem C sequestration across the country.
- North University of China China (People's Republic of)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences China (People's Republic of)
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research China (People's Republic of)
- Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology China (People's Republic of)
- University of British Columbia Canada
Carbon Sequestration, China, Conservation of Natural Resources, Forests, Plants, Grassland, Carbon, Soil, Water Movements, Humans, Biomass, Ecosystem, Program Evaluation
Carbon Sequestration, China, Conservation of Natural Resources, Forests, Plants, Grassland, Carbon, Soil, Water Movements, Humans, Biomass, Ecosystem, Program Evaluation
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).655 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1%
