
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Global environmental changes more frequently offset than intensify detrimental effects of biological invasions
Significance International concern about the consequences of human-induced global environmental changes has prompted a renewed focus on reducing ecological effects of biological invasions, climate change, and nutrient pollution. Our results show that the combined effects of nonnative species invasions and abiotic global environmental changes are often negative but no worse than invasion impacts alone. Invasion impacts are also more strongly detrimental than warming temperatures or nitrogen deposition, two common stressors. Thus, reducing the spread of invasive species is critical for mitigating harms from anthropogenic changes to global ecosystems.
- North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University United States
- Agricultural Research Service United States
- TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY United States
- University of Liverpool United Kingdom
- University of Massachusetts Amherst United States
Antagonism, Invasive species, Anthropogenic Effects, Climate Change, Synergism, Temperature, Biological Sciences, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Nitrogen pollution, Climate change, Humans, Introduced Species, Ecosystem
Antagonism, Invasive species, Anthropogenic Effects, Climate Change, Synergism, Temperature, Biological Sciences, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Nitrogen pollution, Climate change, Humans, Introduced Species, Ecosystem
