Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Agritroparrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Agritrop
Article . 2015
Data sources: Agritrop
Environmental Technology
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Toilet compost and human urine used in agriculture: fertilizer value assessment and effect on cultivated soil properties

Authors: Mariam Sou; Drissa Sangare; R. Lahmar; N. Hijikata; Naoyuki Funamizu; Dakoure; H. Yacouba; +1 Authors

Toilet compost and human urine used in agriculture: fertilizer value assessment and effect on cultivated soil properties

Abstract

Toilet compost (TC) and human urine are among natural fertilizers, which raise interest due to their double advantages to combine sanitation and nutrient recovery. However, combination of urine and TC is not so spread probably because the best ratio (urine/TC) is still an issue and urine effect on soil chemical properties remains poorly documented. This study aims to determine the best ratio of urine and TC in okra cultivation, by targeting higher fertilization effect combined with lower impact on soil chemical properties. Based on Nitrogen requirement of okra, seven treatments were compared: (T0) no fertilizer, (T1) chemical fertilizer (NPK: 14-23-14), (T2) 100% urine, (T3) 100% TC, (T4) ratio of 75% urine+25% TC, (T5) 50% urine+50% TC and (T6) 25% urine+75% TC. Results indicated that T4 (75% urine+25% TC) gave the highest plant height and yield. In contrast, T2 (100% urine) gave the lowest results among all treatments, indicating toxicity effects on plant growth and associated final yield. Such toxicity is confirmed by soil chemical properties at T2 with soil acidification and significant increase in soil salinity. In contrast, application of urine together with TC mitigates soil acidification and salinity, highlighting the efficiency of urine and TC combination on soil chemical properties. However, further investigation is necessary to refine better urine/TC ratio for okra production.

Country
France
Keywords

P33 - Chimie et physique du sol, Recyclage des déchets, Compostage, Organisme indicateur, Teneur en azote, Urine, Abelmoschus esculentus, Soil, Abelmoschus, Humans, Propriété physicochimique du sol, Biomass, Engrais, Toilet Facilities, Fertilizers, Sewage, Sodium, 000 - Autres thèmes, Agriculture, Compost, Biofertilisant, Utilisation des déchets, Fèces, F04 - Fertilisation, Genre humain, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_8081, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_24040, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_5193, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_4586, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_8103, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_2867, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_1795, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_16202, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_15956, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_7182, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_24975, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_2772, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_8557, agrovoc: agrovoc:c_6478

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%