
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Adequacy, fairness and sustainability of pay-as-you-go-pension-systems: defined benefit versus defined contribution

There are three main challenges facing pay-as-you-go public pension systems. First, pension systems need to provide an adequate income for pensioners in the retirement phase. Second, participants wish a fair level of benefits in relation to the contributions paid. Last but not least, the pension system needs to be financially sustainable in the long run. In this paper, we jointly analyse the adequacy, fairness and sustainability of both defined benefit and defined contribution schemes. Finally, risk sharing mechanisms, that involve changes in the key variables of the system, are designed to restore the financial sustainability while we study their consequences on the adequacy and fairness of the system.
- Université Libre de Bruxelles Belgium
- UNSW Sydney Australia
- Université Catholique de Louvain Belgium
- Catholic University of America United States
- University of Liverpool United Kingdom
adequacy, 330, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, fairness, sustainability, public pensions, anzsrc-for: 1502 Banking, Clinical Research, Sciences actuarielles, Finance and Investment, risks, pay-as-you-go
adequacy, 330, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, fairness, sustainability, public pensions, anzsrc-for: 1502 Banking, Clinical Research, Sciences actuarielles, Finance and Investment, risks, pay-as-you-go
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).28 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
