

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Global pressures, specific responses: effects of nutrient enrichment in streams from different biomes

handle: 10256/7522 , 11336/18466 , 2072/320166
Global pressures, specific responses: effects of nutrient enrichment in streams from different biomes
13 p. + 2 p. (Erratum) We assessed the effects of nutrient enrichment on three stream ecosystems running through distinct biomes (Mediterranean, Pampean and Andean). We increased the concentrations of N and P in the stream water 1.6–4-fold following a before–after control–impact paired series (BACIPS) design in each stream, and evaluated changes in the biomass of bacteria, primary producers, invertebrates and fish in the enriched (E) versus control (C) reaches after nutrient addition through a predictive-BACIPS approach. The treatment produced variable biomass responses (2–77% of explained variance) among biological communities and streams. The greatest biomass response was observed for algae in the Andean stream (77% of the variance), although fish also showed important biomass responses (about 9–48%). The strongest biomass response to enrichment (77% in all biological compartments) was found in the Andean stream. The magnitude and seasonality of biomass responses to enrichment were highly site specific, often depending on the basal nutrient concentration and on windows of ecological opportunity (periods when environmental constraints other than nutrients do not limit biomass growth). The Pampean stream, with high basal nutrient concentrations, showed a weak response to enrichment (except for invertebrates), whereas the greater responses of Andean stream communities were presumably favored by wider windows of ecological opportunity in comparison to those from the Mediterranean stream. Despite variation among sites, enrichment globally stimulated the algal-based food webs (algae and invertebrate grazers) but not the detritus-based food webs (bacteria and invertebrate shredders). This study shows that nutrient enrichment tends to globally enhance the biomass of stream biological assemblages, but that its magnitude and extent within the food web are complex and are strongly determined by environmental factors and ecosystem structure. This study was funded by the project GLOBRIO of the Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA) Foundation. Additional funding was obtained from the projects SCARCE (Consolider Ingenio 2010, CSD2009-00065) and CARBONET (CGL2011-30474-C02-01) of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.
Nutrient enrichment, Science, QC1-999, Microbial biomass, stream ecosystem, Biomassa, Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering, Biomes, biomes, nutrient enrichment, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5, Zoología, GE1-350, stream ecosystems, Biomass, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, TD1-1066, windows of opportunity, Ecologia fluvial, fish, microbial biomass, Physics, Q, Windows of opportunity, invertebrates, Invertebrates, Stream ecology, Environmental sciences, ECOLOGIA, Fish, Stream ecosystems
Nutrient enrichment, Science, QC1-999, Microbial biomass, stream ecosystem, Biomassa, Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering, Biomes, biomes, nutrient enrichment, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5, Zoología, GE1-350, stream ecosystems, Biomass, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, TD1-1066, windows of opportunity, Ecologia fluvial, fish, microbial biomass, Physics, Q, Windows of opportunity, invertebrates, Invertebrates, Stream ecology, Environmental sciences, ECOLOGIA, Fish, Stream ecosystems
6 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).32 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% visibility views 36 download downloads 31 - 36views31downloads
Data source Views Downloads DUGiDocs – Universitat de Girona 36 31


