
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Leaf photosynthesis and respiration of three bioenergy crops in relation to temperature and leaf nitrogen: how conserved are biochemical model parameters among crop species?

Given the need for parallel increases in food and energy production from crops in the context of global change, crop simulation models and data sets to feed these models with photosynthesis and respiration parameters are increasingly important. This study provides information on photosynthesis and respiration for three energy crops (sunflower, kenaf, and cynara), reviews relevant information for five other crops (wheat, barley, cotton, tobacco, and grape), and assesses how conserved photosynthesis parameters are among crops. Using large data sets and optimization techniques, the C(3) leaf photosynthesis model of Farquhar, von Caemmerer, and Berry (FvCB) and an empirical night respiration model for tested energy crops accounting for effects of temperature and leaf nitrogen were parameterized. Instead of the common approach of using information on net photosynthesis response to CO(2) at the stomatal cavity (A(n)-C(i)), the model was parameterized by analysing the photosynthesis response to incident light intensity (A(n)-I(inc)). Convincing evidence is provided that the maximum Rubisco carboxylation rate or the maximum electron transport rate was very similar whether derived from A(n)-C(i) or from A(n)-I(inc) data sets. Parameters characterizing Rubisco limitation, electron transport limitation, the degree to which light inhibits leaf respiration, night respiration, and the minimum leaf nitrogen required for photosynthesis were then determined. Model predictions were validated against independent sets. Only a few FvCB parameters were conserved among crop species, thus species-specific FvCB model parameters are needed for crop modelling. Therefore, information from readily available but underexplored A(n)-I(inc) data should be re-analysed, thereby expanding the potential of combining classical photosynthetic data and the biochemical model.
- Wageningen University & Research Netherlands
- Université Wageningen Netherlands
- Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλίας Greece
- ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΙΑΣ Greece
- University Of Thessaly Greece
chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, mountain grassland ecosystems, Light, Nitrogen, Acclimatization, Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase, co2 assimilation, Cell Respiration, mesophyll conductance, Cynara, carbon-dioxide, Models, Biological, Electron Transport, gas-exchange characteristics, Biomass, Leerstoelgroep Gewas- en onkruidecologie, Photosynthesis, Temperature, use efficiency, Carbon Dioxide, Research Papers, electron-transport, Plant Leaves, Hibiscus, stomatal conductance, dioxide response curves, Helianthus, Seasons
chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, mountain grassland ecosystems, Light, Nitrogen, Acclimatization, Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase, co2 assimilation, Cell Respiration, mesophyll conductance, Cynara, carbon-dioxide, Models, Biological, Electron Transport, gas-exchange characteristics, Biomass, Leerstoelgroep Gewas- en onkruidecologie, Photosynthesis, Temperature, use efficiency, Carbon Dioxide, Research Papers, electron-transport, Plant Leaves, Hibiscus, stomatal conductance, dioxide response curves, Helianthus, Seasons
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).51 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
