
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A simplified, data-constrained approach to estimate the permafrost carbon–climate feedback

We present an approach to estimate the feedback from large-scale thawing of permafrost soils using a simplified, data-constrained model that combines three elements: soil carbon (C) maps and profiles to identify the distribution and type of C in permafrost soils; incubation experiments to quantify the rates of C lost after thaw; and models of soil thermal dynamics in response to climate warming. We call the approach the Permafrost Carbon Network Incubation–Panarctic Thermal scaling approach (PInc-PanTher). The approach assumes that C stocks do not decompose at all when frozen, but once thawed follow set decomposition trajectories as a function of soil temperature. The trajectories are determined according to a three-pool decomposition model fitted to incubation data using parameters specific to soil horizon types. We calculate litterfall C inputs required to maintain steady-state C balance for the current climate, and hold those inputs constant. Soil temperatures are taken from the soil thermal modules of ecosystem model simulations forced by a common set of future climate change anomalies under two warming scenarios over the period 2010 to 2100. Under a medium warming scenario (RCP4.5), the approach projects permafrost soil C losses of 12.2–33.4 Pg C; under a high warming scenario (RCP8.5), the approach projects C losses of 27.9–112.6 Pg C. Projected C losses are roughly linearly proportional to global temperature changes across the two scenarios. These results indicate a global sensitivity of frozen soil C to climate change (γsensitivity) of −14 to −19 Pg C °C−1on a 100 year time scale. For CH4emissions, our approach assumes a fixed saturated area and that increases in CH4emissions are related to increased heterotrophic respiration in anoxic soil, yielding CH4emission increases of 7% and 35% for the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, respectively, which add an additional greenhouse gas forcing of approximately 10–18%. The simplified approach presented here neglects many important processes that may amplify or mitigate C release from permafrost soils, but serves as a data-constrained estimate on the forced, large-scale permafrost C response to warming.
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, 550, Databases, Factual, General Science & Technology, Climate Change, Veterinary and Food Sciences, Permafrost, Chemical, carbon–climate feedbacks, Feedback, [ SDE ] Environmental Sciences, Databases, Models, Freezing, Computer Simulation, carbon-climate feedbacks, Factual, Ecosystem, Agricultural, Models, Statistical, Forestry Sciences, methane, 500, Articles, Biological Sciences, Statistical, Carbon, Climate Action, climate change, Models, Chemical, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, permafrost, Environmental Monitoring
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, 550, Databases, Factual, General Science & Technology, Climate Change, Veterinary and Food Sciences, Permafrost, Chemical, carbon–climate feedbacks, Feedback, [ SDE ] Environmental Sciences, Databases, Models, Freezing, Computer Simulation, carbon-climate feedbacks, Factual, Ecosystem, Agricultural, Models, Statistical, Forestry Sciences, methane, 500, Articles, Biological Sciences, Statistical, Carbon, Climate Action, climate change, Models, Chemical, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, permafrost, Environmental Monitoring
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).162 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
