
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint

doi: 10.1111/bjop.12018
pmid: 24387095
The current studies explored the social consequences of exposure to conspiracy theories. In Study 1, participants were exposed to a range of conspiracy theories concerning government involvement in significant events such as the death of Diana, Princess of Wales. Results revealed that exposure to information supporting conspiracy theories reduced participants' intentions to engage in politics, relative to participants who were given information refuting conspiracy theories. This effect was mediated by feelings of political powerlessness. In Study 2, participants were exposed to conspiracy theories concerning the issue of climate change. Results revealed that exposure to information supporting the conspiracy theories reduced participants' intentions to reduce their carbon footprint, relative to participants who were given refuting information, or those in a control condition. This effect was mediated by powerlessness with respect to climate change, uncertainty, and disillusionment. Exposure to climate change conspiracy theories also influenced political intentions, an effect mediated by political powerlessness. The current findings suggest that conspiracy theories may have potentially significant social consequences, and highlight the need for further research on the social psychology of conspiracism.
- Lancaster University United Kingdom
- Northumbria University United Kingdom
- Staffordshire University United Kingdom
- Northumbria University United Kingdom
- University of Kent United Kingdom
Male, Deception, Climate Change, Persuasive Communication, 150, BF, Intention, Models, Psychological, Trust, Psychology, Social, Surveys and Questionnaires, B, Humans, Students, Carbon Footprint, Analysis of Variance, Politics, Uncertainty, 320, C800, Government, Public Opinion, Female, Power, Psychological, Homicide
Male, Deception, Climate Change, Persuasive Communication, 150, BF, Intention, Models, Psychological, Trust, Psychology, Social, Surveys and Questionnaires, B, Humans, Students, Carbon Footprint, Analysis of Variance, Politics, Uncertainty, 320, C800, Government, Public Opinion, Female, Power, Psychological, Homicide
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).415 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
