
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A global evaluation of the effectiveness of voluntary REDD+ projects at reducing deforestation and degradation in the moist tropics

AbstractReducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) projects aim to contribute to climate change mitigation by protecting and enhancing carbon stocks in tropical forests, but there have been no systematic global evaluations of their impact. We used a new data set for tropical humid forests and a standardized evaluation approach (based on pixel matching) to quantify the performance of a representative sample of 40 voluntary REDD+ projects in 9 countries certified under the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS). In the first 5 years of implementation, deforestation within project areas was reduced by 47% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24–68) compared with matched counterfactual pixels, and degradation rates were 58% lower (95% CI: 49–63). Reductions were small in absolute terms but greater in sites located in high‐deforestation settings and did not appear to be substantially undermined by leakage activities in forested areas within 10 km of project boundaries. At the 26th Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the international community renewed its commitment to tackling tropical deforestation as a nature‐based solution to climate change. Our results indicate that incentivizing forest conservation through voluntary site‐based projects can slow tropical deforestation and highlight the particular importance of prioritizing financing for areas at greater risk of deforestation.
- University of East Anglia United Kingdom
- Bangor University United Kingdom
- University of Cambridge United Kingdom
- Bangor University United Kingdom
Conservation of Natural Resources, 碳, Climate Change, impact evaluation, Forests, 333, 森林丧失, forest loss, correspondencia, 生态系统服务, Carbono, Contributed Papers, nature-based solutions, 580, carbon, matching, evaluación de impacto, pérdida de bosques, soluciones basadas en la naturaleza, Carbon, 匹配, 影响评估, 基于自然的解决方案, servicios ecosistémicos, ecosystem services
Conservation of Natural Resources, 碳, Climate Change, impact evaluation, Forests, 333, 森林丧失, forest loss, correspondencia, 生态系统服务, Carbono, Contributed Papers, nature-based solutions, 580, carbon, matching, evaluación de impacto, pérdida de bosques, soluciones basadas en la naturaleza, Carbon, 匹配, 影响评估, 基于自然的解决方案, servicios ecosistémicos, ecosystem services
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).70 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
