Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 550 North ParkStreet, Madison, WI 53706, USAThe influence of climate on forest change during thepast century in the eastern United States was evalu-ated in a recent paper (Nowacki & Abrams, 2014)that centers on an increase in ‘highly competitivemesophytic hardwoods’ (Nowacki & Abrams, 2008)and a concomitant decrease in the more xerophyticQuercus species. Nowacki & Abrams (2014) con-cluded that climate change has not contributed sig-nificantly to observed changes in forest composition.However, the authors restrict their focus to a singleelement of climate: increasing temperature since theend of the Little Ice Age ca. 150 years ago. In theirstudy, species were binned into four classifications(e.g., Acer saccharum – ‘cool-adapted’, Acer rubrum –‘warm-adapted’) based on average annual tempera-ture within each species range in the United States,reducing the multifaceted character of climate into asingle, categorical measure. The broad temperatureclasses not only veil the many biologically relevantaspects of temperature (e.g., seasonal and extremetemperatures) but they may also mask other influ-ences, both climatic (e.g., moisture sensitivity) andnonclimatic (e.g., competition).Understanding the primary drivers of forest changeis critically important. However, using annual tem-perature reduces the broad spectrum of climaticinfluence on forests (e.g., Jackson & Overpeck, 2000;Jackson et al., 2009) to a single variable. Tsuga canad-ensis illustrates one example of the complex interac-tion between trees and temperature. In the southernpart of its range, Tsuga canadensis growth is weakly,but positively correlated with early growing-seasontemperature. However, this relationship becomesstronger and shifts to later in the season toward thenorthern part of its range (Cook & Cole, 1991). More-over, Tsuga canadensis growth is significantly andnegatively correlated with just May temperaturesduring the current growing season in the northeast-ern United States (Cook, 1991; Cook & Cole, 1991;Vaganov et al., 2011), while in the southeastern Uni-ted States it is strongly and negatively correlatedwith summer (June–August) temperatures (Hart et al.,2010). Trees can also be sensitive to diverse and ofteninteracting climate variables at various stages of theirlife cycles (Jackson et al., 2009). Interactions betweenprecipitation and temperature are clearly important(Harsch & Hille Ris Lambers, 2014; Martin-Benito &Pederson, accepted), and often lead to counterintui-tive responses. For example, some plant species thatwould have been expected to move north and ups-