
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A cross‐biome synthesis of soil respiration and its determinants under simulated precipitation changes

doi: 10.1111/gcb.13156
pmid: 26554753
A cross‐biome synthesis of soil respiration and its determinants under simulated precipitation changes
AbstractSoil respiration (Rs) is the second‐largest terrestrial carbon (C) flux. Although Rs has been extensively studied across a broad range of biomes, there is surprisingly little consensus on how the spatiotemporal patterns of Rs will be altered in a warming climate with changing precipitation regimes. Here, we present a global synthesis Rs data from studies that have manipulated precipitation in the field by collating studies from 113 increased precipitation treatments, 91 decreased precipitation treatments, and 14 prolonged drought treatments. Our meta‐analysis indicated that when the increased precipitation treatments were normalized to 28% above the ambient level, the soil moisture, Rs, and the temperature sensitivity (Q10) values increased by an average of 17%, 16%, and 6%, respectively, and the soil temperature decreased by −1.3%. The greatest increases in Rs and Q10 were observed in arid areas, and the stimulation rates decreased with increases in climate humidity. When the decreased precipitation treatments were normalized to 28% below the ambient level, the soil moisture and Rs values decreased by an average of −14% and −17%, respectively, and the soil temperature and Q10 values were not altered. The reductions in soil moisture tended to be greater in more humid areas. Prolonged drought without alterations in the amount of precipitation reduced the soil moisture and Rs by −12% and −6%, respectively, but did not alter Q10. Overall, our synthesis suggests that soil moisture and Rs tend to be more sensitive to increased precipitation in more arid areas and more responsive to decreased precipitation in more humid areas. The responses of Rs and Q10 were predominantly driven by precipitation‐induced changes in the soil moisture, whereas changes in the soil temperature had limited impacts. Finally, our synthesis of prolonged drought experiments also emphasizes the importance of the timing and frequency of precipitation events on ecosystem C cycles. Given these findings, we urge future studies to focus on manipulating the frequency, intensity, and seasonality of precipitation with an aim to improving our ability to predict and model feedback between Rs and climate change.
- North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University United States
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology China (People's Republic of)
- Institute of Botany China (People's Republic of)
- Peking University China (People's Republic of)
- NASA Earth Science United States
570, 550, soil temperature, Climate Change, Rain, drought, 910, precipitation regime, Soil, aridity index, wet, Biology, Soil Microbiology, Ecology, Integrative Biology, Temperature, Water, Biological Sciences, apparent Q(10), Droughts, Climate Action, meta-analysis, apparent Q10, Environmental sciences, Biological sciences, Earth sciences, soil moisture, Environmental Sciences
570, 550, soil temperature, Climate Change, Rain, drought, 910, precipitation regime, Soil, aridity index, wet, Biology, Soil Microbiology, Ecology, Integrative Biology, Temperature, Water, Biological Sciences, apparent Q(10), Droughts, Climate Action, meta-analysis, apparent Q10, Environmental sciences, Biological sciences, Earth sciences, soil moisture, Environmental Sciences
5 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 1986IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2009IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2011IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).235 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
