
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
ForestTemp – Sub‐canopy microclimate temperatures of European forests

ForestTemp – Sub‐canopy microclimate temperatures of European forests
AbstractEcological research heavily relies on coarse‐gridded climate data based on standardized temperature measurements recorded at 2 m height in open landscapes. However, many organisms experience environmental conditions that differ substantially from those captured by these macroclimatic (i.e. free air) temperature grids. In forests, the tree canopy functions as a thermal insulator and buffers sub‐canopy microclimatic conditions, thereby affecting biological and ecological processes. To improve the assessment of climatic conditions and climate‐change‐related impacts on forest‐floor biodiversity and functioning, high‐resolution temperature grids reflecting forest microclimates are thus urgently needed. Combining more than 1200 time series of in situ near‐surface forest temperature with topographical, biological and macroclimatic variables in a machine learning model, we predicted the mean monthly offset between sub‐canopy temperature at 15 cm above the surface and free‐air temperature over the period 2000–2020 at a spatial resolution of 25 m across Europe. This offset was used to evaluate the difference between microclimate and macroclimate across space and seasons and finally enabled us to calculate mean annual and monthly temperatures for European forest understories. We found that sub‐canopy air temperatures differ substantially from free‐air temperatures, being on average 2.1°C (standard deviation ± 1.6°C) lower in summer and 2.0°C higher (±0.7°C) in winter across Europe. Additionally, our high‐resolution maps expose considerable microclimatic variation within landscapes, not captured by the gridded macroclimatic products. The provided forest sub‐canopy temperature maps will enable future research to model below‐canopy biological processes and patterns, as well as species distributions more accurately.
- Czech Academy of Sciences Czech Republic
- Wageningen University & Research Netherlands
- Department of Environmental Sciences ETH Zurich and EAWAG Switzerland
- Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
- University of Life Sciences Prague Czech Republic
Climate Change, MODELS, boosted regression trees, Ecosystem processes, Forests, Trees, SoilTemp, Climate change, Boosted regression trees, Forest, biodiversity; boosted regression trees; climate change; ecosystem processes; forest microclimate; SoilTemp; Species Distributions; thermal buffering, thermal buffering, Biology, climate, ecosystem processes, biodiversity, VULNERABILITY, canopy, Thermal buffering, CHALLENGES, Forest microclimate, Temperature, Biodiversity, Microclimate, CLIMATE, Species distributions, Chemistry, species distributions, climate change, forest microclimate, Species Distributions, SNOW, Earth and Environmental Sciences
Climate Change, MODELS, boosted regression trees, Ecosystem processes, Forests, Trees, SoilTemp, Climate change, Boosted regression trees, Forest, biodiversity; boosted regression trees; climate change; ecosystem processes; forest microclimate; SoilTemp; Species Distributions; thermal buffering, thermal buffering, Biology, climate, ecosystem processes, biodiversity, VULNERABILITY, canopy, Thermal buffering, CHALLENGES, Forest microclimate, Temperature, Biodiversity, Microclimate, CLIMATE, Species distributions, Chemistry, species distributions, climate change, forest microclimate, Species Distributions, SNOW, Earth and Environmental Sciences
1 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).89 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
