
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use

doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12488
pmid: 29497458
pmc: PMC5815384
handle: 10067/1487580151162165141 , 2164/10028
doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12488
pmid: 29497458
pmc: PMC5815384
handle: 10067/1487580151162165141 , 2164/10028
AbstractPerennial bioenergy crops have significant potential to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and contribute to climate change mitigation by substituting for fossil fuels; yet delivering significantGHGsavings will require substantial land‐use change, globally. Over the last decade, research has delivered improved understanding of the environmental benefits and risks of this transition to perennial bioenergy crops, addressing concerns that the impacts of land conversion to perennial bioenergy crops could result in increased rather than decreasedGHGemissions. For policymakers to assess the most cost‐effective and sustainable options for deployment and climate change mitigation, synthesis of these studies is needed to support evidence‐based decision making. In 2015, a workshop was convened with researchers, policymakers and industry/business representatives from theUK,EUand internationally. Outcomes from global research on bioenergy land‐use change were compared to identify areas of consensus, key uncertainties, and research priorities. Here, we discuss the strength of evidence for and against six consensus statements summarising the effects of land‐use change to perennial bioenergy crops on the cycling of carbon, nitrogen and water, in the context of the whole life‐cycle of bioenergy production. Our analysis suggests that the direct impacts of dedicated perennial bioenergy crops on soil carbon and nitrous oxide are increasingly well understood and are often consistent with significant life cycleGHGmitigation from bioenergy relative to conventional energy sources. We conclude that theGHGbalance of perennial bioenergy crop cultivation will often be favourable, with maximumGHGsavings achieved where crops are grown on soils with low carbon stocks and conservative nutrient application, accruing additional environmental benefits such as improved water quality. The analysis reported here demonstrates there is a mature and increasingly comprehensive evidence base on the environmental benefits and risks of bioenergy cultivation which can support the development of a sustainable bioenergy industry.
- Universidade de São Paulo Brazil
- Colorado State University System United States
- University of São Paulo Brazil
- Colorado State University United States
- University of Antwerp Belgium
QH301 Biology, land-use change, SDG 13 - Climate Action, perennial bioenergy crops, Biomass, soil carbon, Waste Management and Disposal, SDG 15 - Life on Land, Nitrous oxide, nitrous oxide, greenhouse gas emissions, Physics, NE/P019455/1, Research Review, Forestry, Soil carbon, 233366, FP7/2007-2013, Engineering sciences. Technology, European Research Council, life-cycle assessment, Life-cycle assessment, 330, Land-use change, 333, EP/M013200/1, QH301, Greenhouse gas emissions, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, Renewable Energy, European Commission, Biology, NE/M006832/1, Sustainability and the Environment, biomass, Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), biofuels, Perennial bioenergy crops, Agriculture and Soil Science, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Biofuels, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production, Agronomy and Crop Science
QH301 Biology, land-use change, SDG 13 - Climate Action, perennial bioenergy crops, Biomass, soil carbon, Waste Management and Disposal, SDG 15 - Life on Land, Nitrous oxide, nitrous oxide, greenhouse gas emissions, Physics, NE/P019455/1, Research Review, Forestry, Soil carbon, 233366, FP7/2007-2013, Engineering sciences. Technology, European Research Council, life-cycle assessment, Life-cycle assessment, 330, Land-use change, 333, EP/M013200/1, QH301, Greenhouse gas emissions, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, Renewable Energy, European Commission, Biology, NE/M006832/1, Sustainability and the Environment, biomass, Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), biofuels, Perennial bioenergy crops, Agriculture and Soil Science, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Biofuels, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production, Agronomy and Crop Science
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).90 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
