
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Fine‐scale heterogeneity in beetle assemblages under co‐occurring Eucalyptus in the same subgenus

handle: 1885/59583
AbstractAim Insect biodiversity is often positively associated with habitat heterogeneity. However, this relationship depends on spatial scale, with most studies focused on differences between habitats at large scales with a variety of forest tree species. We examined fine‐scale heterogeneity in ground‐dwelling beetle assemblages under co‐occurring trees in the same subgenus: Eucalyptus melliodora A. Cunn. ex Schauer and E. blakelyi Maiden (Myrtaceae).Location Critically endangered grassy woodland near Canberra, south‐eastern Australia.Methods We used pitfall traps and Tullgren funnels to sample ground‐dwelling beetles from the litter environment under 47 trees, and examined differences in diversity and composition at spatial scales ranging from 100 to 1000 m.Results Beetle assemblages under the two tree species had distinctive differences in diversity and composition. We found that E. melliodora supported a higher richness and abundance of beetles, but had higher compositional similarity among samples. In contrast, E. blakelyi had a lower abundance and species richness of beetles, but more variability in species composition among samples.Main conclusions Our study shows that heterogeneity in litter habitat under co‐occurring and closely related eucalypt species can influence beetle assemblages at spatial scales of just hundreds of metres. The differential contribution to fine‐scale alpha and beta diversity by each eucalypt can be exploited for conservation purposes by ensuring an appropriate mix of the two species in the temperate woodlands where they co‐occur. This would help not only to maximize biodiversity at landscape scales, but also to maintain heterogeneity in species richness, trophic function and biomass at fine spatial scales.
- La Trobe University Australia
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Australia
- Australian National University Australia
- La Trobe University Australia
Beta diversity, Eucalyptus blakelyi, spatial analysis, similarity index, Eucalyptus melliodora, evergreen forest, Ground beetles, ecosystem function, pitfall trap, leaf litter, landscape ecology, biomass, species diversity, beetle, Spatial scale, coexistence, Australia, endangered species, Invertebrates, woodland, Austral Alpha diversity, Keywords: abundance, Coleoptera, subspecies, heterogeneity, South-eastern Australia, 0608 (four-digit-FOR)
Beta diversity, Eucalyptus blakelyi, spatial analysis, similarity index, Eucalyptus melliodora, evergreen forest, Ground beetles, ecosystem function, pitfall trap, leaf litter, landscape ecology, biomass, species diversity, beetle, Spatial scale, coexistence, Australia, endangered species, Invertebrates, woodland, Austral Alpha diversity, Keywords: abundance, Coleoptera, subspecies, heterogeneity, South-eastern Australia, 0608 (four-digit-FOR)
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).24 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
