
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): game changer or just another quick fix?
Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) provides financial compensation to land owners who avoid converting standing forests to other land uses. In this paper, we review the main opportunities and challenges for REDD+ implementation, including expectations for REDD+ to deliver on multiple environmental and societal cobenefits. We also highlight a recent case study, the Norway–Indonesia REDD+ agreement and discuss how it might be a harbinger of outcomes in other forest‐rich nations seeking REDD+ funds. Looking forward, we critically examine the fundamental assumptions of REDD+ as a solution for the atmospheric buildup of greenhouse gas emissions and tropical deforestation. We conclude that REDD+ is currently the most promising mechanism driving the conservation of tropical forests. Yet, to emerge as a true game changer, REDD+ must still demonstrate that it can access low transaction cost and high‐volume carbon markets or funds, while also providing or complimenting a suite of nonmonetary incentives to encourage a developing nation's transition from forest losing to forest gaining, and align with, not undermine, a globally cohesive attempt to mitigate anthropogenic climate change.
- University of Adelaide Australia
- ETH Zurich Switzerland
- James Cook University Australia
- University of Adelaide Australia
- National University of Singapore Singapore
Greenhouse Effect, Conservation of Natural Resources, 330, REDD, Climate Change, Biodiversity conservation, 333, Trees, Carbon payment scheme, Climate change, carbon payment scheme, Tropical deforestation, Norway, Politics, Biodiversity, Carbon Dioxide, climate change, Socioeconomic Factors, tropical deforestation, Indonesia, biodiversity conservation
Greenhouse Effect, Conservation of Natural Resources, 330, REDD, Climate Change, Biodiversity conservation, 333, Trees, Carbon payment scheme, Climate change, carbon payment scheme, Tropical deforestation, Norway, Politics, Biodiversity, Carbon Dioxide, climate change, Socioeconomic Factors, tropical deforestation, Indonesia, biodiversity conservation
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).67 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
