<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Global modeling of nature’s contributions to people

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Journal 11 Oct 2019Publisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)Journal:Science, volume 366, pages 255-258 (issn: 0036-8075, eissn: 1095-9203,

Authors: Kate A. Brauman; Mary Ruckelshaus; Mary Ruckelshaus; Elena M. Bennett; Lisa Mandle; Jessica M. Silver; Jessica M. Silver; +22 Authors

doi: 10.1126/science.aaw3372

pmid: 31601772

Global modeling of nature’s contributions to people

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

The future of nature's contributions A recent Global Assessment by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services has emphasized the urgent need to determine where and how nature's contribution matters most to people. Chaplin-Kramer et al. have developed a globalscale modeling of ecosystem services, focusing on water quality regulation, coastal protection, and crop pollination (see the Perspective by Balvanera). By 2050, up to 5 billion people may be at risk from diminishing ecosystem services, particularly in Africa and South Asia. Science , this issue p. 255 ; see also p. 184

Related Organizations

View all View all

Keywords

Crops, Agricultural, Conservation of Natural Resources, Asia, Climate Change, Water Pollution, Environment, Models, Theoretical, Nature, Europe, Water Quality, Africa, Humans, Americas, Pollination, Developing Countries, Ecosystem

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	332
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 0.1%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 0.1%