
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Conflicting Climate Change Frames in a Global Field of Media Discourse

handle: 10138/303363 , 10871/29754
Reducing global emissions will require a global cosmopolitan culture built from detailed attention to conflicting national climate change frames (interpretations) in media discourse. The authors analyze the global field of media climate change discourse using 17 diverse cases and 131 frames. They find four main conflicting dimensions of difference: validity of climate science, scale of ecological risk, scale of climate politics, and support for mitigation policy. These dimensions yield four clusters of cases producing a fractured global field. Positive values on the dimensions show modest association with emissions reductions. Data-mining media research is needed to determine trends in this global field.
- National Taiwan University of Arts Taiwan
- University of Minnesota Morris United States
- University of British Columbia Canada
- Tohoku University Japan
- King’s University United States
070, comparative, Global warming, L300, Media and communications, global warming, 300, 3300 General Social Sciences, frame conflicts, climate change, 320 Political science, 10113 Institute of Political Science, Climate change, L200, L100, cosmopolitan
070, comparative, Global warming, L300, Media and communications, global warming, 300, 3300 General Social Sciences, frame conflicts, climate change, 320 Political science, 10113 Institute of Political Science, Climate change, L200, L100, cosmopolitan
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).57 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
