
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The Breast Cancer Alternative Hypothesis: Is There Evidence to Justify Replacing It?

pmid: 20008611
SUMMARY Inconclusion: ● During the last two decades, as a result of the use of systemictherapy in conjunction with breast-conservation surgery andradiation therapy, the incidence of locoregional recurrencehas been reduced to a level where further reduction, a goalworthyofachieving,islikelytohavelittleimpactonsurvival. ● Despitetheextensiveinformationpresentedinthiscommen-tary, there is no new scientifically based evidence to justifyreplacing the current breast cancer hypothesis. ● It is likely that findings from research related to molecularbiologyandgeneticswillbethesourceofinformationthatwillresult in a new, testable thesis that will eventually replace thealternative hypothesis and thus the paradigm that currentlygoverns the treatment of breast cancer. Status of the Breast Cancer Hypothesis www.jco.org © 2009 by American Society of Clinical Oncology 373 Downloaded from jco.ascopubs.org on June 6, 2013. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.Copyright © 2010 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
- University of Pittsburgh United States
Clinical Trials as Topic, Biomedical Research, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Clinical Trials as Topic, Biomedical Research, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).39 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
