
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Limited carbon and biodiversity co‐benefits for tropical forest mammals and birds

doi: 10.1890/15-0935 , 10.1890/15-0935.1
pmid: 27509751
handle: 2158/1152041 , 2027.42/137258 , 10088/27644
doi: 10.1890/15-0935 , 10.1890/15-0935.1
pmid: 27509751
handle: 2158/1152041 , 2027.42/137258 , 10088/27644
AbstractThe conservation of tropical forest carbon stocks offers the opportunity to curb climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and simultaneously conserve biodiversity. However, there has been considerable debate about the extent to which carbon stock conservation will provide benefits to biodiversity in part because whether forests that contain high carbon density in their aboveground biomass also contain high animal diversity is unknown. Here, we empirically examined medium to large bodied ground‐dwelling mammal and bird (hereafter “wildlife”) diversity and carbon stock levels within the tropics using camera trap and vegetation data from a pantropical network of sites. Specifically, we tested whether tropical forests that stored more carbon contained higher wildlife species richness, taxonomic diversity, and trait diversity. We found that carbon stocks were not a significant predictor for any of these three measures of diversity, which suggests that benefits for wildlife diversity will not be maximized unless wildlife diversity is explicitly taken into account; prioritizing carbon stocks alone will not necessarily meet biodiversity conservation goals. We recommend conservation planning that considers both objectives because there is the potential for more wildlife diversity and carbon stock conservation to be achieved for the same total budget if both objectives are pursued in tandem rather than independently. Tropical forests with low elevation variability and low tree density supported significantly higher wildlife diversity. These tropical forest characteristics may provide more affordable proxies of wildlife diversity for future multi‐objective conservation planning when fine scale data on wildlife are lacking.
- Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Ecuador
- Wageningen University & Research Netherlands
- ForestGEO United States
- University of the Sunshine Coast Australia
- White Rose Consortium: University of Leeds; University of Sheffield; University of York United Kingdom
Prioritization, Physiology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Wildlife Management, Animalsia, Forests, Tropic Climate, Aboveground Biomass, Conservation Planning, Deforestation, Videography, Conservation Of Natural Resources, FoR 06 (Biological Sciences), Biodiversity co-benefit, biodiversity coâ benefit, Mammals, FoR 07 (Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences), Leerstoelgroep Resource Ecology, Biodiversity, biodiversità, conservazione, tropici, PE&RC, carbon stocks, Carbon stocks, wildlife conservation, Mammalia, Aves, FoR 05 (Environmental Sciences), REDD+, Environmental Monitoring, Carbon Sequestration, Conservation of Natural Resources, Camera trapping, Science, Climate Change, Mammal, 333, Resource Ecology, Birds, Bird, Tropical Forest, Animals, Forest, Conservation planning, conservation planning, Tropical Climate, Animal, 2303, tropical ecology assessment and monitoring network, Species Diversity, Greenhouse Gas, Carbon, camera trapping, Tropical ecology assessment and monitoring network, Wildlife conservation, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Biogenic Emission, Environmental Protection
Prioritization, Physiology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Wildlife Management, Animalsia, Forests, Tropic Climate, Aboveground Biomass, Conservation Planning, Deforestation, Videography, Conservation Of Natural Resources, FoR 06 (Biological Sciences), Biodiversity co-benefit, biodiversity coâ benefit, Mammals, FoR 07 (Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences), Leerstoelgroep Resource Ecology, Biodiversity, biodiversità, conservazione, tropici, PE&RC, carbon stocks, Carbon stocks, wildlife conservation, Mammalia, Aves, FoR 05 (Environmental Sciences), REDD+, Environmental Monitoring, Carbon Sequestration, Conservation of Natural Resources, Camera trapping, Science, Climate Change, Mammal, 333, Resource Ecology, Birds, Bird, Tropical Forest, Animals, Forest, Conservation planning, conservation planning, Tropical Climate, Animal, 2303, tropical ecology assessment and monitoring network, Species Diversity, Greenhouse Gas, Carbon, camera trapping, Tropical ecology assessment and monitoring network, Wildlife conservation, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Biogenic Emission, Environmental Protection
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).38 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
