
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Are cattle surrogate wildlife? Savanna plant community composition explained by total herbivory more than herbivore type

doi: 10.1890/15-1367.1
pmid: 27755702
Are cattle surrogate wildlife? Savanna plant community composition explained by total herbivory more than herbivore type
AbstractThe widespread replacement of wild ungulate herbivores by domestic livestock in African savannas is composed of two interrelated phenomena: (1) loss or reduction in numbers of individual wildlife species or guilds and (2) addition of livestock to the system. Each can have important implications for plant community dynamics. Yet very few studies have experimentally addressed the individual, combined, and potentially interactive effects of wild vs. domestic herbivore species on herbaceous plant communities within a single system. Additionally, there is little information about whether, and in which contexts, livestock might functionally replace native herbivore wildlife or, alternatively, have fundamentally different effects on plant species composition. The Kenya Long‐term Exclosure Experiment, which has been running since 1995, is composed of six treatment combinations of mega‐herbivores, meso‐herbivore ungulate wildlife, and cattle. We sampled herbaceous vegetation 25 times between 1999 and 2013. We used partial redundancy analysis and linear mixed models to assess effects of herbivore treatments on overall plant community composition and key plant species. Plant communities in the six different herbivore treatments shifted directionally over time and diverged from each other substantially by 2013. Plant community composition was strongly related (R2 = 0.92) to residual plant biomass, a measure of herbivore utilization. Addition of any single herbivore type (cattle, wildlife, or mega‐herbivores) caused a shift in plant community composition that was proportional to its removal of plant biomass. These results suggest that overall herbivory pressure, rather than herbivore type or complex interactions among different herbivore types, was the main driver of changes in plant community composition. Individual plant species, however, did respond most strongly to either wild ungulates or cattle. Although these results suggest considerable functional similarity between a suite of native wild herbivores (which included grazers, browsers, and mixed feeders) and cattle (mostly grazers) with respect to understory plant community composition, responses of individual plant species demonstrate that at the plant‐population‐level impacts of a single livestock species are not functionally identical to those of a diverse group of native herbivores.
- Agricultural Research Service United States
- Dixie State University United States
- University of California, Davis United States
- United States Department of the Interior United States
- Mpala Research Center and Wildlife Foundation Kenya
Conservation of Natural Resources, Time Factors, Population Dynamics, Animals, Wild, Elephant, 333, Forb, Animals, Biomass, Herbivory, Plant Physiological Phenomena, 580, East africa, Human-wildlife confict, Grass, Cattle-wildlife interactions, Plants, Zebra, Grassland, Kenya, Acacia drepanolobium, Herbaceous community, Grazing, Animal Sciences, Cattle, Ecological equivalence
Conservation of Natural Resources, Time Factors, Population Dynamics, Animals, Wild, Elephant, 333, Forb, Animals, Biomass, Herbivory, Plant Physiological Phenomena, 580, East africa, Human-wildlife confict, Grass, Cattle-wildlife interactions, Plants, Zebra, Grassland, Kenya, Acacia drepanolobium, Herbaceous community, Grazing, Animal Sciences, Cattle, Ecological equivalence
4 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2017IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 1994IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).74 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10%
