
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Land Application of Sugar Beet By‐products: Effects on Nitrogen Mineralization and Crop Yields

doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0005
pmid: 19141822
Land application of food processing wastes has become an acceptable practice because of the nutrient value of the wastes and potential cost savings in their disposal. Spoiled beets and pulp are among the main by‐products generated by the sugar beet (Beta vulgarisL.) processing industry. Farmers commonly land apply these by‐products at rates >224 Mg ha−1on a fresh weight basis. However, information on nutrient release in soils treated with these by‐products and their subsequent impacts on crop yield is lacking. Field studies were conducted to determine the effects of sugar beet by‐product application on N release and crop yields over two growing seasons. Treatments in the first year were two rates (224 and 448 Mg ha−1fresh weight) of pulp and spoiled beets and a nonfertilized control. In the second year after by‐product application, the control treatment was fertilized with N fertilizer and an additional treatment was added as a nonfertilized control in buffer areas. Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) was grown in the year of by‐product application and sugar beet in the subsequent year. By‐product treatments caused a significant reduction in wheat grain yield compared with the control. This was due to a decline in N availability as a result of immobilization. Based on microplots receiving15N labeled beets, wheat took up <1% of spoiled beet‐N (approximately 4.7 kg ha−1) during the year of by‐product application. In the second cropping year, sugar beet root yields were significantly higher in the fertilized control and by‐product treatments than the nonfertilized control. The lack of significant difference in sugar beet yield between the fertilized control and by‐product treatments was likely due to the greater availability of N in the second year. Labeled15N data also showed that the sugar beet crop recovered a 17% of sugar beet‐N, an equivalent of 86 kg N ha−1, during the second cropping year. There was no difference in sugar beet root yield, N uptake, or soil N mineralization during the sugar beet cropping season between the pulp and the spoiled beet treatments at comparable rates of application.
- Saint Paul University Canada
- Saint Paul University Canada
- Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago United States
- University of Minnesota Morris United States
- Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago United States
Nitrogen Isotopes, Nitrogen, Garbage, Plant Roots, Plant Leaves, Soil, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Food Industry, Biomass, Beta vulgaris, Triticum
Nitrogen Isotopes, Nitrogen, Garbage, Plant Roots, Plant Leaves, Soil, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Food Industry, Biomass, Beta vulgaris, Triticum
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).8 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
