

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests

pmid: 27973356
handle: 11420/1876 , 10261/207956 , 11311/1009245 , 20.500.12327/1941 , 1822/43883
Production of biogas from different organic materials is a most interesting source of renewable energy. The biomethane potential (BMP) of these materials has to be determined to get insight in design parameters for anaerobic digesters. Although several norms and guidelines for BMP tests exist, inter-laboratory tests regularly show high variability of BMPs for the same substrate. A workshop was held in June 2015, in Leysin, Switzerland, with over 40 attendees from 30 laboratories around the world, to agree on common solutions to the conundrum of inconsistent BMP test results. This paper presents the consensus of the intense roundtable discussions and cross-comparison of methodologies used in respective laboratories. Compulsory elements for the validation of BMP results were defined. They include the minimal number of replicates, the request to carry out blank and positive control assays, a criterion for the test duration, details on BMP calculation, and last but not least criteria for rejection of the BMP tests. Finally, recommendations on items that strongly influence the outcome of BMP tests such as inoculum characteristics, substrate preparation, test setup, and data analysis are presented to increase the probability of obtaining validated and reproducible results.
anaerobic digestion, batch assays, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Biomethane potential (BMP), digestion anaérobie, 660.6: Biotechnologie, biomethane potential (BMP), Batch assay, 333, anaerobic digestion;batch assays;biomethane potential (BMP);organic materials;standardized protocol, 2312 Water Science and Technology, 2305 Environmental Engineering, Anaerobic digestion, Anaerobic digestion; Batch assays; Biomethane potential (BMP); Organic materials; Standardized protocol; Environmental Engineering; Water Science and Technology, énergie renouvelable, Anaerobiosis, organic matter, Science & Technology, protocole de mesure, [ SDV ] Life Sciences [q-bio], Anerobic digestion, Reproducibility of Results, biogaz, Organic materials, renewable energy, potentiel méthane, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], organic materials, Standardized protocol, standardized protocol, 504, matière organique, Biofuels, Laboratories, Methane, Batch assays, Biotechnology
anaerobic digestion, batch assays, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Biomethane potential (BMP), digestion anaérobie, 660.6: Biotechnologie, biomethane potential (BMP), Batch assay, 333, anaerobic digestion;batch assays;biomethane potential (BMP);organic materials;standardized protocol, 2312 Water Science and Technology, 2305 Environmental Engineering, Anaerobic digestion, Anaerobic digestion; Batch assays; Biomethane potential (BMP); Organic materials; Standardized protocol; Environmental Engineering; Water Science and Technology, énergie renouvelable, Anaerobiosis, organic matter, Science & Technology, protocole de mesure, [ SDV ] Life Sciences [q-bio], Anerobic digestion, Reproducibility of Results, biogaz, Organic materials, renewable energy, potentiel méthane, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], organic materials, Standardized protocol, standardized protocol, 504, matière organique, Biofuels, Laboratories, Methane, Batch assays, Biotechnology
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).696 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 0.1% visibility views 71 download downloads 138 - 71views138downloads
Data source Views Downloads DIGITAL.CSIC 66 134 Universidade do Minho: RepositoriUM 5 4


