Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Site characterization for tidal power

Authors: Jim Thomson; Brian Polagye; Sam Gooch; Dallas Meggitt;

Site characterization for tidal power

Abstract

Tidal In-Stream Energy Conversion (TISEC) is a promising source of clean, renewable and predictable energy. One of the preliminary steps in developmening the technology is establishing a standardized and repeatable methodology for the characterization of potential deployment sites. Stationary Acoustic Doppler Profiler (ADCP) velocity data collected at four sites near Marrowstone Island, Puget Sound are used to test the applicability of metrics characterizing maximum and mean velocity, eddy intensity, rate of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation, vertical shear, directionality, ebb and flood asymmetry, vertical profile and other aspects of the flow regime deemed relevant to TISEC. Based on these analyses, the flow at three sites clustered along the east bank of Marrowstone Island (referred to as the "D" sites) are found to be mainly bidirectional and have similar ebb and flood velocities and relatively low levels of turbulent activity. The site near the north point of Marrowstone Island (the "C" site) has higher maximum and mean ebb velocities, but is more asymmetrical and has higher levels of turbulent activity. "In addition, methods are applied to data from another Puget Sound site (Admiralty Inlet), and results are compared. A two-dimensional "velocity map" is developed for the more promising "D" sites, showing the spatial variation of velocities throughout the area. This map is based on data collected using a vessel-mounted ADCP in linear transects running roughly perpendicular to the flow at the site. Interpolation between these transects along isobaths yields a rough grid of velocities, from which the velocity map can be determined using a two-dimensional interpolation scheme. Results are promising, although this method may not work well at sites with different bathymetrie and geographic characteristics. The methods and conclusions are device-neutral, however device specific considerations will be important prior to developing TISEC sites.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    43
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
43
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%