
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A Street Management Framework for Lower Manhattan in New York City

doi: 10.3141/2119-15
Lower Manhattan (LM) is America's fourth-largest central business district and one of the oldest and densest areas in New York City. It is also New York City's fastest-growing residential neighborhood and contains some of the highest levels of pedestrian, transit, and vehicular activity in America. Since September 11, 2001, redevelopment has dramatically transformed the area into a vibrant 24/7 live–work–visit community. The changes present an unprecedented opportunity to create a more livable and environmentally sustainable neighborhood by reducing traffic and managing parking while giving residents and employees better, greener mobility options. Consequently, the city is focused on finding new ways to manage competing demands for different uses of limited street space. Improving street management is paramount to improving the quality of public space and speeding LM's revitalization. In 2004, the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation funded the New York City Economic Development Corporation and the New York City Department of Transportation to contract Arup to undertake a multi-year comprehensive planning study to consider ways to reduce traffic congestion, manage placard parking, and create complete streets and engaging public spaces in LM. This paper discusses the necessity for and development of a proposed street management framework to help guide the city in meeting the transportation and public realm needs of LM's residents, employees, tourists, and businesses. As of October 2008, the project is ongoing; the proposed framework is still conceptual and has not yet been implemented.
- Institute of Transport Studies Australia
- ARUP Laboratories (United States) United States
- ARUP Laboratories (United States) United States
- Institute of Transport Studies Australia
- New York City Department of Transportation United States
330, mode - bus, 710, Residential areas, Parking capacity, place - cbd, New York), Local transit, operations - traffic, Pedestrian density, Sustainable development, Lower Manhattan (New York, Streets, Livable streets, policy - parking, policy - congestion, mode - mass transit, Mobility, Mass transit, Downtowns, Public transit, 380, ridership - commuting, organisation - management, Revitalization, operations - capacity, policy - sustainable, mode - pedestrian, Gridlock (Traffic), Parking, land use - urban density, Sustainability, Central business districts, Parking management, City centers, Transit, City streets, Traffic congestion
330, mode - bus, 710, Residential areas, Parking capacity, place - cbd, New York), Local transit, operations - traffic, Pedestrian density, Sustainable development, Lower Manhattan (New York, Streets, Livable streets, policy - parking, policy - congestion, mode - mass transit, Mobility, Mass transit, Downtowns, Public transit, 380, ridership - commuting, organisation - management, Revitalization, operations - capacity, policy - sustainable, mode - pedestrian, Gridlock (Traffic), Parking, land use - urban density, Sustainability, Central business districts, Parking management, City centers, Transit, City streets, Traffic congestion
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).3 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
