Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Agrobìologìâarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Agrobìologìâ
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Economic and energy efciency of fungicides and microfertilizers in the cultivation of sugar beet hybrids

Authors: A. Potapov; M. Grabovskiy;

Economic and energy efciency of fungicides and microfertilizers in the cultivation of sugar beet hybrids

Abstract

The results of determining sugar beet hybrids economic and energy efciency technology growing depending on the use of fungicides and microfertilizers are presented. The research was conducted in 2020–2022 in the “Svitanok” Agrienterprise of Vasylkiv district, Kyiv region. Research was conducted with two sugar beet hybrids (Pushkin, Akatsia), three variants of microfertilizers (control, YaraVita Bortrac 150 (3 l/ ha), YaraVita Mancozin (1 l/ha)) and three schemes of fungicide application (Stefstrobin (0.6 l/ha) + Shtefozal (0.5 l/ha) + Shtilvet (0.1 l/ha); Tserkostef (0.5 l/ha) + Shtefstrobin (0.6 l/ha) + Shtilvet (0.1 l/ha); Cerkoshtef (0.5 l/ha) + Shtefozal (0.5 l/ha) + Shtilvet (0.1 l/ha )) were studied. The evaluation of the fungicides and microfertilizers economic efciency was determined according to the prices for the end of 2022 according to generally accepted methods. The technology of sugar beets growing is generally accepted for the zone of the Right Bank Forest Steppe, except for the methods that were put to study. It was established that in the structure of economic costs during the cultivation of sugar beets, a signifcant part is occupied by the use of mineral fertilizers – 23.7 %, fuel – 18.6 %, plant protection products – 16.3 %, seeds – 13.5 %. In the structure of energy costs, most of it belongs to fuel (27.8 %), mineral fertilizers (26.9 %), equipment (19.7 %) and labor costs (15.7 %). Energy costs for plant protection products and microfertilizers make 4.5 and 0.7 %. The Akatsia hybrid has higher proftability rates (53245.7 UAH/ha), proftableness (164.9 %) and energy efciency ratio (3.6) compared to the Pushkin hybrid (45462.2 UAH/ha, 147.6 % and 3.3). From an economic and energy point of view, the combined use of microfertilizers YaraVita Mancozin (1 l/ha) and fungicides Tserkoshtef, k. s. (0.5 l/ha) + Stefstrobin k.s. (0.6 l/ha)+ Stilvet (0.1 l/ha) is the most appropriate. Efciency, proftability and energy efciency ratio were 51491.3 and 60394.3 UAH/ha, 161.9 and 181.5 %, 3.58 and 3.94, respectively, for hybrids Pushkin and Acacia. Key words: sugar beets, fungicides, microfertilizers, hybrids, economic efciency, energy efficiency.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold