<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Corrigendum: Killing Two Birds With One Stone – Strain Engineering Facilitates the Development of a Unique Rhamnolipid Production Process

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type , Journal 07 Oct 2020 Germany Publisher:Frontiers Media SAJournal:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, volume 8 (eissn: 2296-4185,

Authors: Isabel Bator; Isabel Bator; Tobias Karmainski; Tobias Karmainski; Till Tiso; Till Tiso; Lars M. Blank; +1 Authors

doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.596414 , 10.18154/rwth-2020-11483

Corrigendum: Killing Two Birds With One Stone – Strain Engineering Facilitates the Development of a Unique Rhamnolipid Production Process

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8, 596414 (2020). doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.596414

Published by Frontiers Media, Lausanne

Country

Germany

Related Organizations

Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres
Germany
Forschungszentrum Jülich
Germany
RWTH Aachen University
Germany

Keywords

info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/570, 570, Pseudomonas, Bioengineering and Biotechnology, synthetic biology, ethanol, metabolic engineering, rhamnolipid, TP248.13-248.65, adaptive laboratory evolution, Biotechnology

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	9
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%