
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://beta.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Maize/soybean strip intercropping produces higher crop yields and saves water under semi-arid conditions

pmid: 36407615
pmc: PMC9667818
Sustainable increases in crop production require efficient use of resources, and intercropping can improve water use efficiency and land productivity at reduced inputs. Thus, in a three-year field experiment, the performance of maize/soybean strip intercropping system differing with maize plant density (6 maize plants m-2, low, D1; 8 maize plants m-2, medium, D2; and 10 maize plants m-2, high, D3) was evaluated in comparison with sole maize or soybean cropping system. Results revealed that among all intercropping treatments, D2 had a significantly higher total leaf area index (maize LAI + soybean LAI; 8.2), total dry matter production (maize dry matter + soybean dry matter; 361.5 g plant-1), and total grain yield (maize grain yield + soybean grain yield; 10122.5 kg ha-1) than D1 and D3, and also higher than sole maize (4.8, 338.7 g plant-1, and 9553.7 kg ha-1) and sole soybean (4.6, 64.8 g plant-1, and 1559.5 kg ha-1). The intercropped maize was more efficient in utilizing the radiation and water, with a radiation use efficiency of 3.5, 5.2, and 4.3 g MJ-1 and water use efficiency of 14.3, 16.2, and 13.3 kg ha-1 mm-1, while that of intercropped soybean was 2.5, 2.1, and 1.8 g MJ-1 and 2.1, 1.9, and 1.5 kg ha-1 mm-1 in D1, D2, and D3, respectively. In intercropping, the land and water equivalent ratios ranged from 1.22 to 1.55, demonstrating that it is a sustainable strategy to improve land and water use efficiencies; this maximization is likely associated with the species complementarities for radiation, water, and land in time and space, which resulted in part from competition avoidance responses that maximize the economic profit (e. g., 1300 US $ ha-1 in D2) over sole maize (798 US $ ha-1) or sole soybean (703 US $ ha-1). Overall, these results indicate that optimizing strip intercropping systems can save 20–50% of water and land, especially under the present scenario of limited resources and climate change. However, further research is required to fully understand the resource capture mechanisms of intercrops in intercropping.
- Xinjiang Agricultural University China (People's Republic of)
- Nanjing Agricultural University China (People's Republic of)
- Kenyatta University Kenya
- Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Pakistan
- Nanjing Agricultural University China (People's Republic of)
Water-use efficiency, water use efficiency, Dry matter, economic profit, Plant Science, Yield (engineering), Crop, land productivity, SB1-1110, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Legumes, Agroforestry Systems and Biodiversity Enhancement, FOS: Mathematics, Crop Yield Stability, Biology, Irrigation, 580, Crop Diversity, Plant culture, Life Sciences, Forestry, sustainability, Agronomy, Materials science, Field experiment, Intercropping, Leaf area index, Metallurgy, Intercropping in Agricultural Systems, competition, Agronomy and Crop Science, Mathematics, Cropping system
Water-use efficiency, water use efficiency, Dry matter, economic profit, Plant Science, Yield (engineering), Crop, land productivity, SB1-1110, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Legumes, Agroforestry Systems and Biodiversity Enhancement, FOS: Mathematics, Crop Yield Stability, Biology, Irrigation, 580, Crop Diversity, Plant culture, Life Sciences, Forestry, sustainability, Agronomy, Materials science, Field experiment, Intercropping, Leaf area index, Metallurgy, Intercropping in Agricultural Systems, competition, Agronomy and Crop Science, Mathematics, Cropping system
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).37 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
